Pinpoint · Judgment search

Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Limited

[2019] NSWLEC 193

Land and Environment Court of NSW · 13 December 2019 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2019 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Secretary, Department of Planning, Industry and Environment v Wollongong Recycling (NSW) Pty Ltd [2020] NSWLEC 125 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 9× · judgment
  2. Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v Sell & Parker Pty Ltd [2022] NSWLEC 60 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Grant Barnes, Chief Regulatory Officer, Natural Resources Access Regulator v Commins [2023] NSWLEC 43 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Environment Protection Authority v Mouawad (also known as Isaac) (No 4) [2023] NSWLEC 76 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Environment Protection Authority v Nath [2024] NSWLEC 10 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  6. Environment Protection Authority v Dial-A-Dump (EC) Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 21 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Environment Protection Authority v BSV Tyre Recycling Australia Pty Ltd [2024] NSWLEC 63 Cited Land and Environment Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 Cited cited 75×
  2. Veen v The Queen [1979] HCA 7 Cited cited 224×
  3. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  4. Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Cited cited 595×
  5. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  6. Environment Protection Authority v Timber Industries Ltd [2001] NSWLEC 25 Cited cited 32×
  7. R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Cited cited 168×
  8. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  9. Bentley v BGP Properties Pty Limited [2006] NSWLEC 34 Cited cited 273×
  10. Environment Protection Authority v Waste Recycling and Processing Corporation [2006] NSWLEC 419 Cited cited 247×
  11. Plath v Rawson [2009] NSWLEC 178 Cited cited 149×
  12. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  13. Chief Executive of the Office of Environment and Heritage v Bombala Investments Pty Ltd [2013] NSWLEC 185 Cited cited 20×
  14. Environment Protection Authority v Wyanga Holdings Pty Ltd; Environment Protection Authority v Cauchi [2015] NSWLEC 78 Cited cited 11×
  15. Environment Protection Authority v Custom Chemicals Pty Ltd [2016] NSWLEC 146 Cited cited 15×
  16. Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Energy Limited; Secretary, Department of Planning and Environment v AGL Upstream Infrastructure investments Pty Limited [2017] NSWLEC 2 Cited cited 24×
  17. Environment Protection Authority v Dyno Nobel Asia Pacific Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 64 Cited cited 20×
  18. Environment Protection Authority v Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd; Chief Executive, Office of Environment and Heritage v Clarence Colliery Pty Ltd [2017] NSWLEC 82 Cited cited 3×
  19. Environment Protection Authority v Mortdale Recycling Pty Ltd [2019] NSWLEC 106 Cited cited 3×
  20. Environment Protection Authority v Minto Recycling Pty Ltd [2019] NSWLEC 91 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.