Pinpoint · Judgment search

Kuruppu v R

[2021] NSWCCA 261

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 5 November 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2023: 2 citing judgments 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Huynh [2023] NSWDC 24 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Golden v Howard [2023] NSWSC 1418 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (52)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 1) [1981] HCA 20 Cited cited 268×
  3. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  4. R v Engert (1996) 84 A Crim R 67 Applied or followed cited 21×
  5. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Cited cited 816×
  6. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  7. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  8. Regina v Wheeler [2000] NSWCCA 34 Cited cited 100×
  9. REGINA v BAKER [2000] NSWCCA 85 Cited cited 184×
  10. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  11. Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305 Cited cited 883×
  12. TKWJ v The Queen [2002] HCA 46 Cited cited 244×
  13. REGINA v ISRAIL [2002] NSWCCA 255 Cited cited 217×
  14. R v FYFFE [2002] NSWSC 751 Cited cited 12×
  15. Eastman v Director of Public Prosecutions (ACT) [2003] HCA 28 Cited cited 180×
  16. GAS v The Queen [2004] HCA 22 Cited cited 133×
  17. Chung v Anderson [2004] NSWCA 321 Cited cited 9×
  18. R v Hemsley [2004] NSWCCA 228 Applied or followed cited 228×
  19. REGINA v LEONARD WILLIAM HOSKINS [2004] NSWCCA 236 Cited cited 7×
  20. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  21. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 369×
  22. Regina v Dagwell [2006] NSWCCA 98 Cited cited 13×
  23. Nguyen v R [2008] NSWCCA 322 Cited cited 22×
  24. Troy LITTLE v R [2009] NSWCCA 113 Cited
  25. REGINA v XX [2009] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 143×
  26. Yi Hong PUAN v R [2009] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 10×
  27. Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 Cited cited 1,194×
  28. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  29. R v Windle [2012] NSWCCA 222 Cited cited 73×
  30. Delaney v R; R v Delaney [2013] NSWCCA 150 Cited cited 50×
  31. R v Hollaway [2013] NSWSC 218 Cited cited 6×
  32. Aslan v R [2014] NSWCCA 114 Cited cited 114×
  33. JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Applied or followed cited 295×
  34. Primmer v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 155 Cited cited 5×
  35. John Wayne TSIAKAS v R [2015] NSWCCA 187 Cited cited 35×
  36. Pannowitz v R [2016] NSWCCA 13 Cited cited 19×
  37. R v Hollaway [2016] NSWCCA 166 Cited cited 4×
  38. R v Jeremiah [2016] NSWCCA 241 Cited cited 15×
  39. GP v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 200 Cited cited 24×
  40. Obeid v R [2017] NSWCCA 221 Cited cited 272×
  41. Tohifolau v R [2018] NSWCCA 283 Cited cited 2×
  42. Banks v R [2018] NSWCCA 41 Cited cited 3×
  43. R v Kuruppu [2018] NSWDC 322 Cited cited 2×
  44. Australian Health & Nutrition Association Ltd v Hive Marketing Group Pty Ltd [2019] NSWCA 61 Cited cited 66×
  45. Roach v R [2019] NSWCCA 160 Cited cited 31×
  46. R v Toohey [2019] NSWCCA 182 Cited cited 8×
  47. CM v R [2020] NSWCCA 136 Cited cited 11×
  48. Moodie v R [2020] NSWCCA 160 Cited cited 69×
  49. Haines v R [2021] NSWCCA 149 Cited cited 7×
  50. Jackson v R [2021] NSWCCA 15 Applied or followed cited 13×
  51. Lai v R [2021] NSWCCA 217 Cited cited 27×
  52. Tammer-Spence v R [2021] NSWCCA 90 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.