Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Yates (a pseudonym)

[2021] NSWDC 701

District Court of NSW · 8 October 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2024: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Burns [2024] NSWDC 173 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (11)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  2. R v Rodric David BOOTH [2009] NSWCCA 89 Cited cited 63×
  3. Minehan v R [2010] NSWCCA 140 Cited cited 104×
  4. BT v R [2010] NSWCCA 267 Cited cited 30×
  5. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  6. R v Dennison [2011] NSWCCA 114 Cited cited 18×
  7. R v NJK [2011] NSWCCA 151 Cited cited 17×
  8. Abbas, Bodiotis, Taleb and Amoun v R [2013] NSWCCA 115 Cited cited 164×
  9. R v Lamella [2014] NSWCCA 122 Cited cited 35×
  10. R v Hutchinson [2018] NSWCCA 152 Cited cited 66×
  11. LB v R [2019] NSWCCA 151 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.