Pinpoint · Judgment search

Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (No 29)

[2021] NSWSC 483

Supreme Court of NSW · 7 May 2021 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2021: 1 citing judgment 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater v Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd [2021] NSWCA 206 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 12× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. National Insurance Co of New Zealand Ltd v Espagne [1961] HCA 15 Cited cited 89×
  2. Batchelor v Burke [1981] HCA 30 Cited cited 38×
  3. Haines v Bendall [1991] HCA 15 Cited cited 166×
  4. Screenco Pty Limited v R L Dew Pty Limited & Anor [2003] NSWCA 319 Cited cited 35×
  5. Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 22) [2019] NSWSC 1657 Cited cited 13×
  6. Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (No 26) [2020] NSWSC 1728 Cited cited 2×
  7. Rodriguez & Sons Pty Limited v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority t/as Seqwater (No 23) [2020] NSWSC 650 Cited cited 6×
  8. Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 27) [2021] NSWSC 145 Cited cited 2×
  9. Rodriguez & Sons Pty Ltd v Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority trading as Seqwater (No 28) [2021] NSWSC 467 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.