Pinpoint · Judgment search

Barnes v R

[2022] NSWCCA 140 ; (2022) 299 A Crim R 483

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 24 June 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 9 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 7

2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 3 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2025: 2 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Newman [2022] NSWCCA 218 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Eden v R [2023] NSWCCA 31 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Stubbings v R [2023] NSWCCA 69 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Garcia-Godos v R; MH v R [2023] NSWCCA 145 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Shalida v R [2024] NSWCCA 55 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  6. ET v R [2024] NSWCCA 131 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  7. Nosti v R [2024] NSWCCA 158 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Elali v R [2025] NSWCCA 9 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Jones v R [2025] NSWCCA 28 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (29)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Lanham [1970] 2 NSWLR 217 Cited
  2. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  3. Lawless v The Queen [1979] HCA 49 Cited cited 59×
  4. R v Munday [1981] 2 NSWLR 177 Applied or followed cited 41×
  5. R v Smith (1987) 44 SASR 587 Cited cited 120×
  6. R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Applied or followed cited 208×
  7. Mickelberg v The Queen [1989] HCA 35 Cited cited 187×
  8. R v Goodwin (1990) 51 A Crim R 328 Applied or followed cited 59×
  9. R v Many (1990) 51 A Crim R 54 Cited cited 35×
  10. R v Fordham (1997) 98 A Crim R 359 Cited cited 68×
  11. R v Ashton [2002] NSWCCA 498 Cited cited 23×
  12. Regina v Diab [2005] NSWCCA 64 Cited cited 7×
  13. Patrick Springer v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 289 Cited cited 31×
  14. Khoury v R [2011] NSWCCA 118 Cited cited 140×
  15. Turkmani v R [2014] NSWCCA 186 Cited cited 24×
  16. Cornwell v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 269 Cited cited 5×
  17. Betts v The Queen [2016] HCA 25 Applied or followed cited 120×
  18. Wright v R [2016] NSWCCA 122 Cited cited 9×
  19. Kaveh v R [2017] NSWCCA 52 Cited cited 6×
  20. Agnew (a pseudonym) v R [2018] NSWCCA 128 Cited cited 2×
  21. Middleton v Director of Public Prosecutions [2019] ACTCA 24 Cited
  22. Rae v R [2019] NSWCCA 284 Cited cited 14×
  23. Middleton v The Queen [2020] ACTCA 6 Cited
  24. Cabezuela v R [2020] NSWCCA 107 Cited cited 17×
  25. Tuncbilek v R [2020] NSWCCA 30 Cited cited 11×
  26. Hoang v R [2020] NSWCCA 324 Cited cited 10×
  27. Scott v R [2020] NSWCCA 81 Cited cited 41×
  28. Toller v R [2021] NSWCCA 204 Cited cited 35×
  29. Richardson v R [2021] NSWCCA 304 Applied or followed cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.