Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Shah (No 2)

[2022] NSWDC 500

District Court of NSW · 16 September 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (24)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. (1978) 13 SASR 237 Cited
  2. R v Muanchukingkan (1990) 52 A Crim R 354 Cited cited 23×
  3. R v Muanchukingkan (1990) 52 A Crime R 354 Cited
  4. (1992) 63 A Crim R 40 Cited
  5. (1992) 63 A Crime R 40 Cited
  6. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  7. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64 Cited cited 1,044×
  8. Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 84 Cited
  9. R v Nguyen; R v Pham [2010] NSWCCA 238 Cited cited 135×
  10. Omorogbe v R [2013] NSWCCA 201 Cited cited 6×
  11. Ojielumhen v R [2014] ACTCA 28 Cited cited 4×
  12. Barbaro v The Queen [2014] HCA 2 Cited cited 358×
  13. Eriyo v R [2015] NSWCCA 16 Cited cited 9×
  14. R v Villalobos [2018] VCC 1334 Cited
  15. R v Nguyen [2019] NSWDC 174 Cited
  16. R v Freeman [2019] QCA 150 Cited
  17. Lopes Duque v The Queen [2019] VSCA 212 Cited cited 2×
  18. R v LeGros [2020] NSWDC 733 Cited
  19. R v Lau [2020] NSWDC 843 Cited
  20. R v Pink [2021] NSWDC 47 Cited cited 2×
  21. Robson-Bolan v R [2022] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 3×
  22. Veale v R [2022] NSWCCA 154 Cited
  23. Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Cited cited 88×
  24. R v Chew [2022] NSWDC 325 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.