Pinpoint · Judgment search

Richards v R

[2023] NSWCCA 107

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 19 May 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v CS [2023] NSWDC 189 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  2. R v PG [2023] NSWDC 449 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  3. R v RH [2024] NSWDC 379 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  4. R v Edwards [2024] NSWDC 497 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (35)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. R v Todd [1982] 2 NSWLR 517 Cited cited 218×
  3. Neal v The Queen [1982] HCA 55 Applied or followed cited 116×
  4. R v Todd [1982] NSWLR 517 Cited cited 5×
  5. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  6. R v Simpson (1992) 61 A Crim R 58 Cited cited 68×
  7. (33) and R v Law (Queensland Court of Appeal) (1995) 84 A Crim R 142 Cited cited 5×
  8. Postiglione v The Queen [1997] HCA 26 Applied or followed cited 816×
  9. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  10. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  11. REGINA v BAKER [2000] NSWCCA 85 Applied or followed cited 184×
  12. Ryan v The Queen [2001] HCA 21 Applied or followed cited 307×
  13. R v Kay [2004] NSWCCA 130 Cited cited 25×
  14. R v Shorten [2005] NSWCCA 106 Cited cited 17×
  15. Regina v Webster [2005] NSWCCA 110 Cited cited 12×
  16. Regina v Nightingale [2005] NSWCCA 147 Cited cited 10×
  17. R v Knight [2005] NSWCCA 241 Cited cited 3×
  18. R v Kerrie-Ellen Robyn Knight [2005] NSWCCA 253 Cited cited 68×
  19. Regina v HATHAWAY [2005] NSWCCA 368 Cited cited 28×
  20. Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 487×
  21. R v M.A.K., R v M.S.K. [2006] NSWCCA 381 Applied or followed cited 369×
  22. REGINA v Phillip Ronald SPIERS [2008] NSWCCA 107 Cited cited 16×
  23. WAKEFIELD v R [2010] NSWCCA 12 Cited cited 18×
  24. Wu v R [2011] NSWCCA 102 Cited cited 15×
  25. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Applied or followed cited 1,170×
  26. McKittrick v R [2014] NSWCCA 128 Cited cited 17×
  27. JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Cited cited 295×
  28. Bidgood v R [2016] NSWCCA 138 Applied or followed cited 6×
  29. Kerr v R [2016] NSWCCA 218 Cited cited 72×
  30. GP v Regina [2017] NSWCCA 200 Cited cited 24×
  31. R v Cattell [2019] NSWCCA 297 Cited cited 66×
  32. CM v R [2020] NSWCCA 136 Cited cited 11×
  33. Lonsdale v R [2020] NSWCCA 267 Cited cited 13×
  34. R v Obbens [2022] NSWCCA 109 Distinguished cited 11×
  35. JL v R [2023] NSWCCA 99 Cited cited 11×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.