Pinpoint · Judgment search

The Prothonotary v X

[2024] NSWCA 251

NSW Court of Appeal · 31 October 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Applied or followed cited 3,164×
  2. NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION v HAMMAN [1999] NSWCA 404 Cited cited 63×
  3. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  4. NEW SOUTH WALES BAR ASSOCIATION v CUMMINS [2001] NSWCA 284 Cited cited 186×
  5. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of NSW v P [2003] NSWCA 320 Applied or followed cited 59×
  6. Stanoevski v The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales [2008] NSWCA 93 Cited cited 42×
  7. Prothonotary v Gregory [2017] NSWCA 101 Applied or followed cited 16×
  8. Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Thomson [2018] NSWCA 230 Cited cited 8×
  9. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Parente [2019] NSWCA 33 Cited cited 23×
  10. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Jafari [2020] NSWCA 53 Applied or followed cited 11×
  11. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Green [2022] NSWCA 257 Cited cited 12×
  12. Council of the Law Society of New South Wales v Clarke [2022] NSWCA 57 Cited cited 8×
  13. R v Nean [2023] NSWDC 34 Cited cited 2×
  14. R v X (a pseudonym) [2023] NSWDC 344 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.