Pinpoint · Judgment search

Marshall v R

[2024] NSWCCA 194

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 28 October 2024 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2024: 1 citing judgment 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Missingham [2024] NSWDC 512 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26 Cited cited 283×
  2. R v De Simoni [1981] HCA 31 Cited cited 608×
  3. R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 Applied or followed cited 109×
  4. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Applied or followed cited 1,716×
  5. Hoare v The Queen [1989] HCA 33 Cited cited 241×
  6. R v Brown [1999] NSWCCA 323 Cited cited 26×
  7. R v Hammoud [2000] NSWCCA 540 Cited cited 199×
  8. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  9. R v Gorman [2002] NSWCCA 516 Applied or followed cited 54×
  10. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Applied or followed cited 2,508×
  11. Regina v Janceski [2005] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 69×
  12. Regina v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 Cited cited 183×
  13. Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 180×
  14. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Applied or followed cited 601×
  15. Hunt & Hunt Lawyers v Mitchell Morgan Nominees Pty Ltd [No 2] [2013] HCA 23 Cited cited 5×
  16. Elias v The Queen [2013] HCA 31 Cited cited 141×
  17. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  18. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Cited cited 712×
  19. The Queen v Kilic [2016] HCA 48 Applied or followed cited 168×
  20. White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190 Cited cited 29×
  21. R v Gray [2018] NSWCCA 241 Cited cited 11×
  22. DS v R; DM v R [2022] NSWCCA 156 Cited cited 89×
  23. Browne v R [2023] NSWCCA 218 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.