Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Gray

[2018] NSWCCA 241

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 26 October 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 8

2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 4 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Paul William Turner [2018] NSWSC 1929 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  2. R v Taleb (No 5) (Sentence) [2019] NSWSC 720 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 8× · judgment
  3. Mark Anthony GINN [2019] NSWDC 892 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  4. R v Brookes (No. 2) [2020] NSWDC 504 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  5. R v Prouting-Smith [2020] NSWDC 644 Applied or followed District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v Tsingolas [2022] NSWDC 34 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  7. Browne v R [2023] NSWCCA 218 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Braithwaite v R [2024] NSWCCA 15 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  9. R v Franklin [2024] NSWDC 356 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  10. Lupica v R [2024] NSWCCA 111 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Marshall v R [2024] NSWCCA 194 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (19)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Power v The Queen [1974] HCA 26 Cited cited 283×
  2. R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Cited cited 57×
  3. R v Holder (1983) 3 NSWLR 245 Cited cited 181×
  4. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  5. Bugmy v The Queen [1990] HCA 18 Cited cited 191×
  6. Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29 Cited cited 405×
  7. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  8. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  9. REGINA v SIMPSON [2001] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 682×
  10. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S APPLICATION UNDER s37 OF THE CRIMES (SENTENCING PROCEDURE) ACT 1999 NO 1 OF 2002 [2002] NSWCCA 518 Cited cited 871×
  11. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Overruled or disapproved cited 907×
  12. Regina v MMK [2006] NSWCCA 272 Cited cited 183×
  13. MULATO v REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 282 Cited cited 404×
  14. Callaghan v R [2006] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 180×
  15. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  16. R v GWM [2012] NSWCCA 240 Cited cited 48×
  17. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  18. White v R [2016] NSWCCA 190 Cited cited 29×
  19. Lee v Regina [2016] NSWCCA 66 Cited cited 4×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.