Pinpoint · Judgment search

Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (No 2)

[1981] VR 81

VR · 1981 · Find the judgment

Cited by 20 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 17

2000: 1 citing judgment 2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 2 citing judgments 2005: 3 citing judgments 2006: 2 citing judgments 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 3 citing judgments 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 1981 1990 2000 2010 2020
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Stuart v Sanderson [2000] FCA 870 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  2. BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1669 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 33× · judgment
  3. BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 221 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 36× · judgment
  4. Re Ruddock; Ex Parte LX [2003] FCA 561 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  5. Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 71× · judgment
  6. S394 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1421 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  7. NADZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 975 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  8. Applicant S1198/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1349 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. SZFOG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1374 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  10. MZWHU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1387 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  11. S1141 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1608 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission [2007] FCA 939 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Bonnell v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 60 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. J F Keir Pty Limited v Sparks [2008] FCA 611 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 14× · judgment
  15. Australian Education Union v Lawler [2008] FCAFC 135 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 18× · judgment
  16. DBA16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1777 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  17. H Lundbeck A/S v Commissioner of Patents [2019] FCA 535 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  18. AIO21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCA 1105 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  19. Aldous v State of New South Wales [2022] NSWSC 703 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  20. AIO21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 114 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

This judgment is not in the index, so the authorities it cites are not known here. It is shown because indexed judgments cite it.

How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.