Pinpoint · Judgment search

DBA16 v Minister for Home Affairs

[2018] FCA 1777

Federal Court of Australia · 23 November 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Huynh v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2019] FCA 891 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  2. DHX17 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 127 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 22× · judgment
  3. Tu'uta Katoa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] HCA 28 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 90× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (54)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Gardner v Jay (1885) 29 Ch D 50 Applied or followed cited 5×
  2. Huntley v Alexander (1922) 30 CLR 566 Applied or followed cited 4×
  3. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  4. Evans v Bartlam [1940] HCA 27 Cited cited 104×
  5. Yat Tung Investment Co Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd [1975] AC 581 Cited cited 57×
  6. Reg v Bicanin (1976) 15 SASR 20 Cited cited 2×
  7. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45 Applied or followed cited 1,021×
  8. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (No 2) [1981] VR 81 Cited cited 20×
  9. University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28 Cited cited 557×
  10. Norbis v Norbis [1986] HCA 17 Cited cited 255×
  11. Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1995] FCA 1299 Cited cited 78×
  12. Craig v South Australia [1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×
  13. Macquarie Bank Ltd v National Mutual Life Association of Australia Ltd (1996) 40 NSWLR 543 Cited cited 96×
  14. Ling v Commonwealth [1996] FCA 1646 Cited cited 57×
  15. Jackamarra (an Infant) v Krakouer [1998] HCA 27 Cited cited 537×
  16. Stuart v Sanderson [2000] FCA 870 Cited cited 17×
  17. BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 221 Cited cited 36×
  18. NAAV v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 228 Cited cited 289×
  19. The Queen v Carroll [2002] HCA 55 Cited cited 92×
  20. Daniel v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 21 Cited cited 24×
  21. Applicant A210 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 579 Cited
  22. Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 Cited cited 71×
  23. S635 OF 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 65 Cited cited 4×
  24. The Waterways Authority v Fitzgibbon [2005] HCA 57 Cited cited 216×
  25. Egglishaw v Australian Crime Commission [2007] FCAFC 183 Cited cited 20×
  26. Australian Education Union v Lawler [2008] FCAFC 135 Cited cited 18×
  27. SZAJB v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCAFC 75 Cited cited 42×
  28. Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1 Cited cited 821×
  29. Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski & Anor [2010] NSWCA 33 Cited cited 79×
  30. Kong v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1345 Cited cited 5×
  31. Sahin v National Australia Bank Ltd [2012] VSCA 317 Cited cited 3×
  32. MZZIV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1203 Cited cited 25×
  33. Tang v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCAFC 139 Cited cited 67×
  34. Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18 Cited cited 1,516×
  35. Mladenov v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2014] FCA 12 Cited cited 32×
  36. SZTDC v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1298 Cited cited 14×
  37. MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391 Cited cited 230×
  38. SZTES v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 719 Cited cited 53×
  39. Truthful Endeavour Pty Ltd v Condon (Trustee), in the matter of Rayhill (Bankrupt) [2015] FCAFC 70 Cited cited 38×
  40. Tomlinson v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Limited [2015] HCA 28 Cited cited 323×
  41. AZAFX v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2016] FCA 1139 Distinguished cited 13×
  42. MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 139×
  43. Timbercorp Finance Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Collins [2016] HCA 44 Cited cited 80×
  44. BVW17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1508 Cited cited 15×
  45. DBA16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1580 Cited cited 5×
  46. Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v AMA16 [2017] FCAFC 136 Cited cited 50×
  47. BMB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 169 Cited cited 29×
  48. DBA16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2017] FCCA 320 Cited cited 4×
  49. [2018] FCA 2761 Cited
  50. DBB16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCAFC 178 Cited cited 12×
  51. DMI16 v Federal Circuit Court of Australia [2018] FCAFC 95 Cited cited 27×
  52. DBD16 v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2018] FCCA 1801 Cited cited 4×
  53. DBC16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCCA 1802 Cited cited 2×
  54. DBA16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCCA 2761 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.