Pinpoint · Judgment search

Stuart v Sanderson

[2000] FCA 870 ; (2000) 100 FCR 150

Federal Court of Australia · 28 June 2000 · Official judgment

Cited by 17 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 10 Cited 6

2000: 1 citing judgment 2001: 2 citing judgments, 1 negative 2002: 2 citing judgments 2004: 3 citing judgments 2005: 3 citing judgments 2006: 2 citing judgments 2008: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Zakrzewski, in the matter of Zakrzewski v Rodgers [2000] FCA 1187 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Bal v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1191 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  3. BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1669 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 33× · judgment
  4. Crewdson v Department of Community Services & Anor [2002] NSWIRComm 121 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 14× · judgment
  5. BC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 221 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 36× · judgment
  6. Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 51 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 30× · judgment
  7. Wong v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 242 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 71× · judgment
  8. S394 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1421 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. NADZ v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 975 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  10. Applicant S1198/2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1349 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  11. SZFOG v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1374 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  12. MZWHU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCA 1387 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  13. S1141 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1608 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Bonnell v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 60 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  15. Blinoff v Strangio & ors [2009] NSWADT 32 Cited Administrative Decisions Tribunal (NSW) · judgment
  16. Kong v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 1345 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  17. DBA16 v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1777 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (26)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Blair v Curran [1939] HCA 23 Cited cited 473×
  2. Avon Downs Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1949] HCA 26 Applied or followed cited 337×
  3. Connelly v Director of Public Prosecutions [1964] AC 1254 Applied or followed cited 98×
  4. Mills v Cooper [1967] 2 QB 459 Cited cited 15×
  5. Yat Tung Investment Co Ltd v Dao Heng Bank Ltd [1975] AC 581 Cited cited 57×
  6. Twist v Randwick Municipal Council [1976] HCA 58 Cited cited 144×
  7. Port of Melbourne v Anshun [1980] VR 321 Not followed
  8. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun Pty Ltd [1981] HCA 45 Applied or followed cited 1,021×
  9. Hunter v Chief Constable of the West Midlands Police [1981] UKHL 13 Cited cited 195×
  10. Port of Melbourne Authority v Anshun (No 2) [1981] VR 81 Applied or followed cited 20×
  11. Formosa v Department of Social Security [1988] FCA 291 Cited cited 29×
  12. Chamberlain v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1988] HCA 21 Cited cited 168×
  13. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Kurtovic [1990] FCA 19 Cited cited 139×
  14. Trawl Industries of Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) v Effem Foods Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 406 Applied or followed cited 73×
  15. Sawyer v Department of Primary Industry (1992) 38 FCR 375 Applied or followed cited 2×
  16. Minister for Immigration v Karas (1992) 42 FCR 349 Cited cited 2×
  17. Minister for Immigration v Karas (1992) 42 FCR 406 Applied or followed cited 3×
  18. Rogers v The Queen [1994] HCA 42 Applied or followed cited 398×
  19. Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1995] FCA 1299 Applied or followed cited 78×
  20. Madden v Madden (1996) 136 ALR 98 Cited cited 4×
  21. Ling v Commonwealth [1996] FCA 1646 Applied or followed cited 57×
  22. (1997) 71 ALJ 934 Cited cited 9×
  23. (1997) 71 ALJ 942 Cited cited 2×
  24. Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×
  25. Hembury v Chief of the General Staff [1998] HCA 47 Applied or followed cited 20×
  26. Sidhu v Holmes [2000] FCA 776 Applied or followed cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.