Pinpoint · Judgment search

Morales, Monica Del Carmen Lillo v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs

[1998] FCA 334 ; (1998) 82 FCR 374

Federal Court of Australia · 6 April 1998 · Official judgment

Cited by 25 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 2 Cited 22

2001: 1 citing judgment, 1 negative 2002: 1 citing judgment 2003: 2 citing judgments 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 3 citing judgments 2008: 2 citing judgments 2009: 4 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 3 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2019: 4 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 1998 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Commissioner of Taxation v Zoffanies Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 236 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 20× · judgment
  2. Kaluza v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 97 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 9× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Administration of Papua and New Guinea v Daera Guba [1973] HCA 59 Cited cited 93×
  2. Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] FCA 39 Cited cited 491×
  3. Director-General of Social Services v Hangan (1982) 70 FLR 212 Applied or followed cited 7×
  4. Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Gungor [1982] FCA 99 Applied or followed cited 46×
  5. Commonwealth v Sciacca (1988) 17 FCR 476 Cited cited 16×
  6. Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 23 FCR 477 Cited
  7. Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions [1988] FCA 450 Cited cited 70×
  8. Midland Metals Overseas Ltd v Comptroller-General of Customs (1991) 30 FCR 87 Cited cited 14×
  9. March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12 Applied or followed cited 721×
  10. Re Quinn and Australian Postal Corporation (1992) 15 AAR 519 Distinguished cited 8×
  11. Trade Practices Commission v The Gillette Company (No 1) [1993] FCA 496 Cited cited 36×
  12. Comcare v Grimes (1994) 121 ALR 485 Cited cited 3×
  13. (1994) 21 AAR 9 Cited
  14. Re Renata and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1994) 33 ALD 307 Cited
  15. Repatriation Commission v Nation (1995) 57 FCR 25 Cited cited 60×
  16. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Teo, D. [1995] FCA 246 Applied or followed cited 74×
  17. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
  18. (1996) 4 A J Admin L 37 Cited
  19. (1996) 4 AJAL 37 Cited
  20. Irving, David John Cawdell v Minister of State for Immigration, Local Government & Ethnic Affairs [1996] FCA 663 Applied or followed cited 24×
  21. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×
  22. Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs v Baker, Wendy Susan [1997] FCA 105 Applied or followed cited 49×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.