Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Ceissman

[2001] NSWCCA 73 ; (2001) 119 A Crim R 535

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 16 March 2001 · Official judgment

Cited by 24 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 20

2001: 1 citing judgment 2002: 5 citing judgments 2003: 2 citing judgments 2004: 5 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 1 citing judgment 2012: 2 citing judgments 2013: 2 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2001 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Regina v Togias [2001] NSWCCA 522 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 65× · judgment
  2. REGINA v FERNANDO [2002] NSWCCA 28 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 62× · judgment
  3. R v MacDonnell [2002] NSWCCA 34 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 58× · judgment
  4. Regina v Ryan [2002] NSWCCA 171 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  5. R v SPEECHLEY [2002] NSWCCA 300 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  6. R v Lamb & Thurston [2002] NSWSC 1025 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  7. R v Morgan [2003] NSWCCA 230 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  8. R v PECKHAM [2003] NSWCCA 293 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  9. R v Newman, R v Simpson [2004] NSWCCA 102 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 51× · judgment
  10. Regina v Snider [2004] NSWCCA 134 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  11. R v Thurston [2004] NSWCCA 98 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  12. Regina v S B Williams [2004] NSWCCA 246 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  13. Regina v Prasad [2004] NSWCCA 293 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  14. Regina v Fields [2005] NSWCCA 37 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  15. ANDREWS v R [2007] NSWCCA 68 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Carr v R [2009] NSWSC 995 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 11× · judgment
  17. BP v R [2010] NSWCCA 159 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 186× · judgment
  18. Van Eeden v R [2012] NSWCCA 18 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  19. R v BUGMY [2012] NSWCCA 223 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  20. Gaudie v Local Court of New South Wales and Anor [2013] NSWSC 1425 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 17× · judgment
  21. R v Zerafa [2013] NSWCCA 222 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 58× · judgment
  22. HJ v R [2014] NSWCCA 21 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 23× · judgment
  23. R v Candace Martin [2017] NSWSC 1498 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  24. R v Salgado [2021] NSWDC 24 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (32)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Rushby (1977) 1 NSWLR 594 Applied or followed cited 70×
  2. Griffiths v The Queen [1977] HCA 44 Cited cited 233×
  3. R v Tait [1979] FCA 32 Cited cited 135×
  4. R v Osenkowski (1982) 30 SASR 212 Cited cited 57×
  5. Adami and Adami v R (1989) 42 A Crim R 88 Cited cited 2×
  6. R v El Karhani (1990) 21 NSWLR 370 Cited cited 134×
  7. R v Readman (1990) 47 ACrimR 181 Applied or followed cited 5×
  8. R v Sinclair (1990) 51 A Crim R 418 Cited cited 11×
  9. R v Ferrer-Esis (1991) 55 A Crim R 231 Cited cited 100×
  10. R v Dodd (1991) 57 ACrimR 349 Applied or followed cited 8×
  11. R v Hallocoglu (1992) 29 NSWLR 67 Cited cited 80×
  12. R v Fernando (1992) 76 A Crim R 58 Applied or followed cited 274×
  13. R v Fernando (1992) 76 ACrimR 58 Distinguished cited 22×
  14. R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561 Cited cited 158×
  15. R v Stone (1995) 84 A Crim R 218 Applied or followed cited 7×
  16. R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 Cited cited 200×
  17. (1997) 94 A Crim R 466 Cited cited 2×
  18. R v Lawson (1997) 98 A Crim R 463 Cited cited 5×
  19. R v Lawson (1997) 98 ACrimR 463 Applied or followed cited 2×
  20. R v Carmody (1998) 100 A Crim R 41 Cited cited 5×
  21. R v Bernier (1998) 102 A Crim R 44 Cited cited 47×
  22. R v Jurisic [1998] NSWSC 423 Applied or followed cited 273×
  23. (1999) 106 A Crim R 474 Cited
  24. (1999) 108 ACrimR 464 Applied or followed
  25. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  26. REGINA v HENRY BARBER TRAN SILVER TSOUKATOS KYROGLOU JENKINS [1999] NSWCCA 111 Cited cited 1,285×
  27. REGINA v. CROWDEY [1999] NSWCCA 24 Cited
  28. REGINA v WONG & LEUNG [1999] NSWCCA 420 Cited cited 141×
  29. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Cited cited 2,216×
  30. REGINA v BAKER [2000] NSWCCA 85 Cited cited 184×
  31. R v Ngui and Tiong [2000] VSCA 78 Cited cited 8×
  32. R v Ceissman (2001) 160 FLR 252 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.