Pinpoint · Judgment search

WAGL v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

[2002] FCA 952

Federal Court of Australia · 30 July 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (14)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Coldham; Ex parte Australian Workers' Union [1983] HCA 35 Cited cited 59×
  2. O'Toole v Charles David Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 14 Cited cited 103×
  3. Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Richard Walter Pty Ltd [1995] HCA 23 Cited cited 172×
  4. Darling Casino Ltd v NSW Casino Control Authority [1997] HCA 11 Cited cited 99×
  5. Walton v Philip Ruddock, The Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1839 Cited cited 33×
  6. SAAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 101 Cited cited 8×
  7. NAAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 263 Cited cited 66×
  8. NABE v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 281 Cited cited 25×
  9. Ratumaiwai v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 311 Cited cited 21×
  10. Turcan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 397 Cited cited 21×
  11. Boakye-Danquah v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 438 Cited cited 31×
  12. Kwan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 498 Cited cited 22×
  13. Awan v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 594 Cited cited 12×
  14. NAAG of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 713 Cited cited 59×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.