Pinpoint · Judgment search

Awa v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 63;

[2002] FCAFC 63 ; (2002) 189 ALR 328

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 19 March 2002 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2003: 1 citing judgment 2004: 3 citing judgments 2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2002 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Uranek v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 37 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Howells v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCA 530 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Shaw v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2004] FCA 1353 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  4. Watson v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 1654 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Shaw v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 106 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 3× · judgment
  6. Thanh Tra Lam v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCAFC 184 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  7. HSKJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1013 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (16)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs [1979] AATA 179 Cited cited 660×
  2. Local Government and Ethnic Affairs v Gray [1994] FCA 225 Cited cited 67×
  3. Minister of State for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh [1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×
  4. Bustescu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [1999] FCA 1713 Distinguished cited 11×
  5. Re Golding and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] AATA 956 Cited
  6. Re Peljha and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2000] AATA 967 Cited
  7. Lau v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 698 Distinguished cited 6×
  8. Re Batula v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] AATA 496 Cited
  9. Andary v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1544 Applied or followed cited 9×
  10. Aksu v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 514 Cited cited 29×
  11. Wan v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 568 Applied or followed cited 57×
  12. Ruhl v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 648 Applied or followed cited 22×
  13. Turini v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 822 Not followed cited 8×
  14. Javillonar v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 854 Applied or followed cited 23×
  15. Jahnke v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 897 Applied or followed cited 17×
  16. Awa v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCA 291 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.