Pinpoint · Judgment search

Inspector Clark v Hamar Engineering Pty Ltd

[2003] NSWIRComm 27

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 17 February 2003 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (12)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Camilleri's Stock Feeds Pty Ltd v Environment Protection Authority (1993) 32 NSWLR 683 Cited cited 595×
  2. Nesmat Pty Limited v WorkCover Authority (NSW) (1998) 87 IR 312 Cited cited 72×
  3. WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Hannah) v Albury City Council (1998) 90 IR 397 Cited
  4. Department of Mineral Resources of NSW (McKensey) v Kembla Coal and Coke Pty Ltd [1999] NSWIRComm 353 Cited cited 197×
  5. R v THOMSON; R v HOULTON [2000] NSWCCA 309 Applied or followed cited 2,216×
  6. Page v Walco Hoist Rentals Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] NSWIRComm 39 Cited cited 372×
  7. Capral Aluminium Limited v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales [2000] NSWIRComm 71 Cited cited 775×
  8. Manpac Industries Pty Ltd (formerly t/as Pacific Concrete & Quarries Pty Ltd) v WorkCover Authority of New South Wales (Inspector Glass) [2001] NSWIRComm 190 Cited cited 78×
  9. WorkCover Authority of New South Wales v Byrne Civil Engineering Constructions Pty Ltd (No 2) [2001] NSWIRComm 264 Cited cited 9×
  10. Benbow v Converquip Pty Limited [2001] NSWIRComm 85 Cited cited 18×
  11. Cameron v The Queen [2002] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 349×
  12. REGINA v SHARMA [2002] NSWCCA 142 Cited cited 215×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.