Federal Court of Australia · 13 February 2004 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2000] HCA 30 Cited cited 208×[1932] HCA 9 Cited cited 195×[1988] HCA 13 Cited cited 131×[1994] HCA 54 Cited cited 357×[1995] HCA 43 Cited cited 348×[1991] HCA 21 Cited cited 243×[1992] HCA 34 Cited cited 601×[1993] HCA 15 Cited cited 493×[1994] HCA 54 Cited cited 357×[1995] HCA 36 Cited cited 129×[1989] HCA 61 Cited cited 257×[1992] HCA 10 Cited cited 734×[1992] HCA 28 Cited cited 442×[1994] HCA 54 Cited cited 357×[1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 59 Cited cited 1,384×[1997] HCA 6 Cited cited 1,033×[1997] HCA 1 Cited cited 613×[2002] HCA 30 Cited cited 630×[1959] HCA 8 Cited cited 2,918×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2003] HCA 1 Cited cited 185×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1999] HCA 21 Cited cited 971×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2003] HCA 2 Cited cited 1,335×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2003] FCA 74 Cited cited 55×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2002] FCAFC 228 Not followed cited 289×[1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×[1996] HCA 6 Applied or followed cited 2,712×[1998] HCA 28 Applied or followed cited 2,785×[1998] HCA 11 Cited cited 2,226×[2003] HCA 2 Applied or followed cited 1,335×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[2000] HCA 30
Cited cited 208× [2002] HCA 30
Cited cited 630× [2003] FCA 74
Cited cited 55× [2003] HCA 1
Cited cited 185× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.