Pinpoint · Judgment search

Nine Films & Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Limited

[2005] FCA 356 ; (2005) 65 IPR 442

Federal Court of Australia · 5 April 2005 · Official judgment

Cited by 21 indexed judgments

All Cited 21

2005: 1 citing judgment 2006: 1 citing judgment 2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 2 citing judgments 2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2012: 3 citing judgments 2014: 2 citing judgments 2015: 3 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2024: 2 citing judgments 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Seven Network Limited v News Limited (No 10) [2005] FCA 1721 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  2. AWB Limited v Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole (No 5) [2006] FCA 1234 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 148× · judgment
  3. Rich v Harrington [2007] FCA 1987 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 30× · judgment
  4. Sharjade Pty Ltd v RAAF Landings [2008] NSWSC 151 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. Osland v Secretary to the Department of Justice [2008] HCA 37 Cited High Court of Australia · cited 119× · judgment
  6. Limit (No 3) Limited v ACE Insurance Limited (No 3) [2009] NSWSC 1061 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  7. RCI Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2009] FCA 910 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Dye v Commonwealth Securities Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 950 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 10× · judgment
  9. Hanks v Admiralty Resources NL (No 2) [2011] FCA 1464 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  10. Kirby v Centro Properties Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 70 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 14× · judgment
  11. Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited (No 2) [2012] FCA 1358 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  12. Winra v Skycity Adelaide Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 1447 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 45 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. Larsson v Office of Environment and Heritage [2014] NSWCATAD 136 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 8× · judgment
  15. Krok v Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 51 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  16. Anbu v Vulcanite Pty Limited [2015] FCA 283 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Port Kembla Coal Terminal Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 1088 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 9× · judgment
  18. Martin v Norton Rose Fulbright Australia (No 2) [2019] FCA 96 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  19. In the matter of Northern Energy Corporation Limited [2020] NSWSC 1073 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  20. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Noumi Ltd [2024] FCA 349 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  21. INPEX Operations Australia Pty Ltd v AkzoNobel NV (No 2) [2024] FCA 815 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Skinner & Co v Perry (1893) 10 RPC 1 Applied or followed cited 5×
  2. Skinner v Perry [1893] 10 RPC 1 Cited
  3. Potter v Minahan [1908] HCA 63 Cited cited 229×
  4. Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34 Applied or followed cited 3,164×
  5. S W Hart & Co Pty Ltd v Edwards Hot Water Systems (1980) 30 ALR 657 Applied or followed cited 4×
  6. Baker v Campbell [1983] HCA 39 Cited cited 243×
  7. Attorney-General (NT) v Maurice [1986] HCA 80 Cited cited 300×
  8. Commissioner of Australian Federal Police v Propend Finance Pty Ltd (1996) 188 CLR 501 Applied or followed cited 4×
  9. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp v South Australian Brewing Co Ltd (1996) 34 IPR 225 Applied or followed cited 6×
  10. Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd [1996] HCA 15 Cited cited 42×
  11. Ampolex Ltd v Perpetual Trustee Co (Canberra) Ltd [1996] NSWSC 7 Cited cited 67×
  12. Adelaide Steamship Co Ltd v Spalvins (1998) 152 ALR 418 Cited cited 38×
  13. Australian Home Loans Ltd t/as Aussie Home Loans v Phillips, Lee Anthony & Anor [1998] FCA 181 Cited cited 7×
  14. Mann v Carnell [1999] HCA 66 Applied or followed cited 514×
  15. The Daniels Corporation International Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] HCA 49 Applied or followed cited 324×
  16. DSE (Holdings) Pty Limited v Intertan Inc [2003] FCA 384 Distinguished cited 123×
  17. Bennett v Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Customs Service [2004] FCAFC 237 Applied or followed cited 59×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.