Pinpoint · Judgment search

Dragan Vasiljkovic v Minister for Justice and Customs and Ors

[2006] FCA 1346

Federal Court of Australia · 13 October 2006 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2007: 1 citing judgment 2006 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2007] FCA 1902 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (17)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28 Cited cited 557×
  2. Newby v Moodie and Another (1987) 78 ALR 603 Cited
  3. Wiest v Director of Public Prosecutions (1988) 81 ALR 129 Applied or followed cited 2×
  4. Yates v Wilson [1989] HCA 68 Cited cited 27×
  5. Polyukhovich v The Commonwealth [1991] HCA 32 Cited cited 121×
  6. Regina v Governor of Brixton Prison; Ex parte Osmon (No. 3) [1992] 1 WLR 36 Cited
  7. Jarrett v Seymour (1993) 119 ALR 46 Cited cited 10×
  8. Jarrett v Seymour (1993) 46 FCR 557 Cited cited 33×
  9. Elliott v Seymour (1993) 68 ALJR 173 Cited cited 3×
  10. Elliott v Seymour [1993] HCA 70 Cited cited 8×
  11. Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR 386 Applied or followed cited 75×
  12. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Applied or followed cited 87×
  13. Federal Republic of Germany v Parker (1998) 84 FCR 323 Cited cited 14×
  14. Peniche v Hannan [1999] FCA 915 Cited cited 4×
  15. Pasini v United Mexican States [2002] HCA 3 Cited cited 47×
  16. Forsyth v United Kingdom [2003] FCA 1084 Cited cited 2×
  17. Vasiljkovic v Commonwealth of Australia [2006] HCA 40 Cited cited 65×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.