Federal Court of Australia · 14 November 2007 · Official judgment
No indexed judgment cites this case yet.
The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.
[2003] HCA 60 Cited cited 164×[2003] FCAFC 126 Cited cited 153×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1966] HCA 69 Cited cited 109×[1985] HCA 67 Distinguished cited 118×[1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×[1992] HCA 57 Cited cited 375×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[1981] HCA 26 Cited cited 693×[1994] HCA 15 Cited cited 371×[1995] HCA 20 Cited cited 502×[1997] HCA 4 Cited cited 414×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2003] HCA 2 Applied or followed cited 1,335×[1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1998] HCA 28 Cited cited 2,785×[2003] HCA 6 Cited cited 918×[1985] HCA 81 Cited cited 1,205×[1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×[2006] HCA 63 Cited cited 914×[1975] AC 295 Cited cited 122×[1984] FCA 57 Cited cited 378×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×(1994) 49 FCR 576 Cited cited 452×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[1986] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2003] HCA 60 Cited cited 164×[2007] HCA 26 Cited cited 615×[1986] HCA 33 Cited cited 1,127×[1986] HCA 54 Cited cited 682×[1992] HCA 10 Cited cited 734×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[1989] HCA 62 Cited cited 873×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1990] HCA 21 Cited cited 736×[1993] FCA 456 Cited cited 845×[1999] HCA 14 Cited cited 844×[1986] HCA 40 Applied or followed cited 2,191×[1990] HCA 33 Cited cited 2,077×[1995] HCA 58 Cited cited 1,391×[1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×[2000] HCA 57 Cited cited 962×Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.
[2003] FCAFC 126
Cited cited 153× [2003] HCA 60
Cited cited 164× [2006] HCA 63
Cited cited 914× [2007] HCA 26
Cited cited 615× Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.
Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.
Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.
Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.