Pinpoint · Judgment search

SZHUS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs

[2007] FCA 64

Federal Court of Australia · 7 February 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Cited 2

2007: 1 citing judgment 2008: 1 citing judgment 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SZKCV V Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 1201 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  2. SZLPH v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 744 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Al-Mehdawi v Secretary of State for the Home Department [1990] 1 AC 876 Cited cited 29×
  2. Randhawa v MILGEA [1994] FCA 1253 Cited cited 448×
  3. NVAA v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 136 FLR 407 Cited
  4. Freeman v Health Insurance Commission (2004) 141 FCR 129 Cited cited 4×
  5. B41 of 2003, in the matter of an application for a Writ of Mandamus, Prohibition and Certiorari against Refugee Review Tribunal [2004] FCA 30 Cited cited 11×
  6. SZBSZ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 779 Cited cited 9×
  7. Smithkline Beecham PLC v FH Faulding & Co Ltd [2004] FCA 999 Cited
  8. NASF v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 162 Cited cited 6×
  9. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v VSAF of 2003 [2005] FCAFC 73 Cited cited 68×
  10. SZDPB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2006] FCAFC 110 Cited cited 9×
  11. Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs v SZFDE [2006] FCAFC 142 Cited cited 59×
  12. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Lay Lat [2006] FCAFC 61 Applied or followed cited 89×
  13. SZCIJ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2006] FCAFC 62 Applied or followed cited 38×
  14. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v SZFHC [2006] FCAFC 73 Cited cited 19×
  15. SZHZB v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2006] FMCA 169 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.