Pinpoint · Judgment search

Diesing & Ors v Regina

[2007] NSWCCA 326

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 27 November 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 11

2009: 1 citing judgment 2010: 2 citing judgments 2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 3 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. SAT v R [2009] NSWCCA 172 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Regina (C'Wealth) v Elomar & Ors [2010] NSWSC 10 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 22× · judgment
  3. AE v THE QUEEN [2010] NSWCCA 203 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Kwon, Joseph v R [2011] NSWCCA 58 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. Kalache v R [2011] NSWCCA 210 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  6. R v DW [2012] NSWCCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 47× · judgment
  7. Pettersen v R [2013] NSWCCA 20 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  8. Dang v R [2013] NSWCCA 246 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 18× · judgment
  9. Greenaway v R [2013] NSWCCA 270 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  10. Elomar v R; Hasan v R; Cheikho v R; Cheikho v R; Jamal v R [2014] NSWCCA 303 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 106× · judgment
  11. R v Kassis [2015] NSWDC 178 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  12. R v Khoder El Ali [2017] NSWDC 46 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  13. Hitchen v R [2023] NSWCCA 51 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Kane [1975] VR 658 Cited cited 4×
  2. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  3. Baumer v R [1988] HCA 67 Cited cited 186×
  4. Savvas v The Queen [1995] HCA 29 Cited cited 92×
  5. Postiglione v The Queen (1996-97) 189 CLR 295 Cited cited 8×
  6. Regina v Moon [2000] NSWCCA 534 Cited cited 116×
  7. R v REICHER [2003] NSWCCA 300 Cited cited 4×
  8. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×
  9. R v So [2004] NSWCCA 362 Cited cited 7×
  10. R v AJP [2004] NSWCCA 434 Cited cited 224×
  11. R v Wilkinson [2004] NSWCCA 468 Cited
  12. Regina v Ohar [2004] NSWCCA 83 Cited cited 19×
  13. R v Kelly [2005] NSWCCA 280 Cited cited 24×
  14. Regina v Nguyen; Regina v Pham; Regina v Vu; Regina v To [2005] NSWCCA 362 Cited cited 37×
  15. Des Rosiers v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 16 Cited cited 22×
  16. Regina v Burgess [2006] NSWCCA 319 Cited cited 7×
  17. ELYARD v. REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 43 Not followed cited 96×
  18. BAXTER v REGINA [2007] NSWCCA 237 Cited cited 112×
  19. Tyler v Regina; Regina v Chalmers [2007] NSWCCA 247 Cited cited 125×
  20. DAC v Regina [2206] NSWCCA 265 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.