Pinpoint · Judgment search

Hitchen v R

[2023] NSWCCA 51

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 14 December 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Vu v R [2023] NSWCCA 315 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Edwards (1996) 90 A Crim R 510 Cited cited 200×
  2. R v Stafrace (1997) 96 A Crim R 452 Cited cited 11×
  3. R v Qutami [2001] NSWCCA 353 Cited cited 396×
  4. R v Palu [2002] NSWCCA 381 Cited cited 157×
  5. Regina v Ohar [2004] NSWCCA 83 Cited cited 19×
  6. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  7. D A C v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 265 Cited cited 10×
  8. TS v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 13×
  9. Diesing & Ors v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 326 Cited cited 13×
  10. BUTTERS, Jarrod Dean v R [2010] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 81×
  11. Pfitzner v R [2010] NSWCCA 314 Cited cited 45×
  12. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  13. Alvares v R Farache v R [2011] NSWCCA 33 Cited cited 47×
  14. Mammone (Pino) v R [2013] NSWCCA 325 Cited
  15. Mammone v R [2013] NSWCCA 95 Cited cited 31×
  16. Imbornone v R [2017] NSWCCA 144 Cited cited 203×
  17. Vaiusu v R [2017] NSWCCA 71 Cited cited 44×
  18. Cashel v R [2018] NSWCCA 292 Cited cited 4×
  19. R v Campbell; R v Smith [2019] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 19×
  20. IM v R [2019] NSWCCA 107 Cited cited 11×
  21. El Kheir v R [2019] NSWCCA 288 Cited cited 10×
  22. Hitchen v R [2021] NSWCCA 293 Cited
  23. Meis v R [2022] NSWCCA 118 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.