Pinpoint · Judgment search

Cashel v R

[2018] NSWCCA 292

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 14 December 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lewis v R [2021] NSWCCA 108 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  2. Hesketh v R [2021] NSWCCA 262 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  3. White v R [2022] NSWCCA 241 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  4. Hitchen v R [2023] NSWCCA 51 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Haughton v Smith [1975] AC 476 Cited cited 12×
  2. Britten v Alpogut [1987] VR 929 Cited cited 7×
  3. R v Thomas (1993) 67 A Crim R 308 Cited cited 9×
  4. R v Deng (1996) 91 A Crim R 80 Cited cited 12×
  5. R v Sessions (1997) 95 A Crim R 151 Cited cited 3×
  6. R v Sessions [1998] 2 VR 304 Cited cited 5×
  7. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  8. R v Blyth [2001] NSWCCA 402 Cited
  9. Regina v Glen Alan Jackson [2004] NSWCCA 110 Cited cited 8×
  10. R v Langdon and Langdon [2004] VSCA 205 Cited cited 4×
  11. Island Maritime Limited v Filipowski [2006] HCA 30 Cited cited 42×
  12. McKeagg v The Queen [2006] WASCA 26 Cited cited 2×
  13. Mouroufas v R [2007] NSWCCA 58 Cited cited 2×
  14. Hosseini v R [2009] NSWCCA 52 Cited cited 4×
  15. Yousef Jidah v R [2014] NSWCCA 270 Cited cited 16×
  16. Pellegrino v R [2014] NSWCCA 287 Cited
  17. R v Bucic [2016] NSWCCA 297 Cited
  18. Dayment v R [2018] NSWCCA 132 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.