Pinpoint · Judgment search

Ritchie v R

[2023] NSWCCA 153

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 23 June 2023 · Official judgment

Cited by 2 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 1

2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 1 citing judgment 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Wang v R [2023] NSWCCA 208 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  2. KS v R [2024] NSWCCA 147 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (29)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  2. Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 Cited cited 929×
  3. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  4. Tatana v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 398 Applied or followed cited 57×
  5. Xue v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 227 Applied or followed cited 3×
  6. PHAM v R [2009] NSWCCA 25 Cited cited 23×
  7. Crystal Lee ENGLAND v R, Sackda PHANITH v R [2009] NSWCCA 274 Cited cited 54×
  8. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  9. Gill v R [2010] NSWCCA 236 Cited cited 28×
  10. JIMMY v REGINA [2010] NSWCCA 60 Cited cited 187×
  11. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  12. Agius v The Queen [2013] HCA 27 Cited cited 34×
  13. Bugmy v The Queen [2013] HCA 37 Cited cited 1,170×
  14. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Cited cited 712×
  15. Carr v R [2014] NSWCCA 202 Cited cited 4×
  16. DS v R [2014] NSWCCA 267 Cited cited 32×
  17. Estephan v R [2015] NSWCCA 100 Cited cited 6×
  18. Miles v R [2017] NSWCCA 266 Cited cited 28×
  19. Wat v R [2017] NSWCCA 62 Cited cited 22×
  20. Er v R [2018] NSWCCA 286 Cited cited 3×
  21. Chamon v R [2020] NSWCCA 112 Cited cited 25×
  22. Tsimingos v R [2021] NSWCCA 107 Cited cited 3×
  23. Lewis v R [2021] NSWCCA 108 Cited cited 4×
  24. Li v R [2021] NSWCCA 75 Cited cited 4×
  25. Kitson v R [2022] NSWCCA 166 Cited cited 2×
  26. C v R [2022] NSWCCA 285 Cited cited 7×
  27. Z v R [2022] NSWCCA 286 Cited cited 6×
  28. Totaan v R [2022] NSWCCA 75 Cited cited 88×
  29. Sadiq v R [2023] NSWCCA 25 Cited
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.