Pinpoint · Judgment search

Meis v R

[2022] NSWCCA 118

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 8 June 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2022: 3 citing judgments 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Musa v R [2022] NSWCCA 221 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · judgment
  2. Police v Chidiac [2022] NSWLC 20 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  3. Police v Elliot [2022] NSWLC 23 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  4. Hitchen v R [2023] NSWCCA 51 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 1× · judgment
  5. Police v Andonakis [2023] NSWLC 15 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  6. SafeWork NSW v Saunders Civilbuild Pty Ltd [2024] NSWDC 245 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (8)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. R v Olbrich [1999] HCA 54 Cited cited 1,119×
  3. Vukelic v Glad Cleaning Service [2003] NSWCA 253 Cited
  4. Siljeg v Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited & Ors [2004] NSWCA 193 Cited cited 2×
  5. Regina v Way [2004] NSWCCA 131 Cited cited 907×
  6. R v Johnson [2004] NSWCCA 76 Cited cited 69×
  7. NATIONAL ROADS AND MOTORISTS' ASSOCIATION v WHITLAM [2007] NSWCA 81 Cited cited 14×
  8. Kentwell v The Queen [2014] HCA 37 Cited cited 712×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.