Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Peng GAO; R v Benjamin LIM; Benjamin LIM v R

[2007] NSWCCA 343

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 14 December 2007 · Official judgment

Cited by 16 indexed judgments

All Cited 16

2008: 2 citing judgments 2009: 2 citing judgments 2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 4 citing judgments 2012: 2 citing judgments 2014: 1 citing judgment 2015: 1 citing judgment 2017: 3 citing judgments 2007 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Gao v R [2008] NSWCCA 234 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Ly v R [2008] NSWCCA 262 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  3. Xiao Feng WANG v R [2009] NSWCCA 223 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  4. Xue v Regina [2009] NSWCCA 227 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  5. TAN v R [2010] NSWCCA 207 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  6. Kwon, Joseph v R [2011] NSWCCA 58 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  7. R v Achurch [2011] NSWCCA 186 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 49× · judgment
  8. Paxton v R [2011] NSWCCA 242 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 49× · judgment
  9. Aoun v R [2011] NSWCCA 284 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 25× · judgment
  10. R v DW [2012] NSWCCA 66 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 47× · judgment
  11. Hsu v R [2012] NSWCCA 248 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment
  12. NSW Police v Hardman [2014] NSWLC 11 Cited Local Court of NSW · judgment
  13. R v Kassis [2015] NSWDC 178 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  14. R v Mella [2017] NSWDC 193 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  15. Taysavang v R; Lee v R [2017] NSWCCA 146 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  16. R v MOK, Hin Lok [2017] NSWDC 314 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Regina v Chan [1999] NSWCCA 103 Cited cited 31×
  2. R v Y [2002] NSWCCA 191 Cited cited 6×
  3. VU v. REGINA [2006] NSWCCA 188 Cited cited 34×
  4. R v SCIBERRAS [2006] NSWCCA 268 Cited cited 17×
  5. Truong v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 318 Cited cited 11×
  6. Fahs v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 26 Cited cited 48×
  7. McKibben v R [2007] NSWCCA 89 Cited cited 7×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.