Pinpoint · Judgment search

Anthony v Australian Native Landscapes Pty Ltd

[2008] NSWDC 109

District Court of NSW · 2 July 2008 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Muller v Dalgety & Co Ltd [1909] HCA 67 Cited cited 36×
  2. Carr v Finance Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 2) [1982] HCA 43 Cited cited 33×
  3. Rheem Australia Ltd v Manufacturers' Mutual Insurance Ltd [1984] 2 NSWLR 370 Cited cited 9×
  4. Podrebersek v Australian Iron & Steel Pty Ltd [1985] HCA 34 Cited cited 428×
  5. Riley v The Commonwealth [1985] HCA 82 Cited cited 35×
  6. Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Comber [1986] FCA 92 Cited cited 32×
  7. Bankstown Foundry Pty Ltd v Braistina [1986] HCA 20 Cited cited 151×
  8. Nicol v Allyacht Spars Pty Ltd [1987] HCA 68 Cited cited 24×
  9. Fennell v Supervision & Engineering Services Holdings Pty Ltd (1988) 47 SASR 6 Cited cited 29×
  10. Workers' Compensation Board of Queensland v Technical Products Pty Ltd [1988] HCA 49 Applied or followed cited 93×
  11. East Finchley Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 90 ALR 457 Cited cited 25×
  12. Hughes & Anor v Sydney Day Nursery [2000] NSWSC 462 Applied or followed
  13. Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd [2000] WASCA 357 Cited cited 12×
  14. Tame v New South Wales [2002] HCA 35 Cited cited 291×
  15. Hughes v SDN Children's Services [2002] NSWCA 11 Cited
  16. TNT AUSTRALIA PTY LIMITED v CHRISTIE & 2 ORS; CROWN EQUIPMENT PTY LIMITED v CHRISTIE & 2 ORS; MANPOWER SERVICES (AUST) PTY LIMITED v CHRISTIE & 2 ORS [2003] NSWCA 47 Cited cited 126×
  17. Multiplex Constructions Pty Limited v Irving & 2 Ors; Fugen Holdings Pty Limited v Irving & 2 Ors [2004] NSWCA 346 Cited cited 11×
  18. Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd v Thompson (2006) 67 NSWLR 87 Applied or followed
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.