Pinpoint · Judgment search

International Sports Marketing Pty Ltd v Oasis Development Corporation Pty Ltd

[2009] NSWIRComm 34

Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · 18 March 2009 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2009: 1 citing judgment 2009 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Anley and Department of Education and Training [2009] NSWIRComm 39 Cited Industrial Relations Commission of NSW · cited 5× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (9)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  2. Allen v Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons Ltd [1968] 2 QB 229 Cited cited 15×
  3. Re Jokai Tea Holdings Limited (1993) 1 All ER 630 Applied or followed
  4. Queensland v JL Holdings Pty Ltd [1997] HCA 1 Cited cited 613×
  5. Raymond HOSER v Christopher HARTCHER [1999] NSWSC 527 Cited cited 91×
  6. Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd & Anor [2001] NSWCA 274 Cited cited 181×
  7. Western Sydney Area Health Service v Gibson [2001] NSWIRComm 290 Cited cited 41×
  8. International Sports Marketing Pty Ltd and anor v Oasis Development Corporation Pty Ltd and ors (No 4) [2008] NSWIRComm 202 Cited
  9. Jorgensen v Slater & Gordon Pty Ltd [2008] VSCA 110 Applied or followed cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.