Pinpoint · Judgment search

Sergei Ivanovski v Walter Perdacher

[2009] NSWSC 913

Supreme Court of NSW · 4 September 2009 · Official judgment

Cited by 7 indexed judgments

All Cited 7

2009: 2 citing judgments 2013: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2024: 2 citing judgments 2009 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ivanovski v Keith Stevens McConnell as representative of the estate of Walter Perdacher (deceased) [2009] NSWSC 1036 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Sergei Ivanovski v Keith Stevens McConnell [2009] NSWSC 1129 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  3. GEL Custodians Pty Limited v The Estate of the late Geoffrey Francis Wells [2013] NSWSC 973 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 20× · judgment
  4. Bayside Council v Estate of Goodman [2019] NSWSC 530 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Cong v Shen [2019] NSWSC 1675 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  6. Katsoulas v Kritikakis; Katsoulas v Apostolatos [2024] NSWSC 67 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 5× · judgment
  7. Reeves v Reeves (No 2) [2024] NSWSC 386 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (4)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Duke v Davis [1893] 2 QB 260 Cited cited 2×
  2. Colquhoun v Graffione (Administrator), in the matter of Colquhoun [2000] FCA 325 Cited cited 4×
  3. Vukic v Luca Grbin & Ors; Estate of Zvonko Grbin [2006] NSWSC 41 Cited cited 48×
  4. Aon Risk Services Australia Limited v Australian National University [2009] HCA 27 Cited cited 1,635×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.