Pinpoint · Judgment search

Zentai v Honourable Brendan O'Connor (No 4)

[2010] FCA 1385

Federal Court of Australia · 10 December 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2011: 2 citing judgments 2012: 1 citing judgment 2014: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. O'Connor v Zentai [2011] FCAFC 102 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 10× · judgment
  2. Honourable Brendan O’Connor v Zentai [2011] FCA 1162 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  3. Adamas v The Hon Brendan O'Connor (No 3) [2012] FCA 365 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Snedden v Minister for Justice for the Commonwealth of Australia [2014] FCAFC 156 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 46× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (29)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Forster v Farquhar (1893) 1 QB 564 Cited cited 19×
  2. Ritter v Godfrey (1920) 2 KB 47 Cited cited 33×
  3. Cretazzo v Lombardi (1975) 13 SASR 4 Cited cited 313×
  4. Public Service Board of New South Wales v Osmond [1986] HCA 7 Cited cited 336×
  5. Patton v Minister for Defence (1987) 13 FCR 476 Cited cited 4×
  6. Hempel v Moore (1987) 13 FCR 480 Applied or followed cited 7×
  7. Tuncak v Young (1987) 14 ALD 286 Applied or followed cited 5×
  8. Trade Practices Commission v Manfal Pty Ltd (1990) 27 FCR 284 Cited cited 3×
  9. Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission [1992] HCA 10 Cited cited 734×
  10. Mok v Minister for Immigration (No 2) [1993] FCA 650 Cited cited 30×
  11. Public Prosecutions (Cth), Director of v Kainhofer [1995] HCA 35 Cited cited 87×
  12. Henderson, Russell Fraser & Ors v Amadio Pty Ltd & Ors (No. 3) [1996] FCA 184 Cited cited 7×
  13. Aussie Airlines Pty Ltd v Australian Airlines Ltd & Ors [1996] FCA 813 Cited cited 53×
  14. Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice (1999) 164 ALR 357 Cited cited 11×
  15. Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v Holloway [2000] FCA 1245 Cited cited 26×
  16. Dr Martens Australia Pty Ltd v Figgins Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2000] FCA 602 Cited cited 95×
  17. Australian Trade Commission v Disktravel [2000] FCA 62 Cited cited 30×
  18. Ruddock v Vadarlis [2001] FCA 1865 Cited cited 461×
  19. BHP Billiton Iron Ore Pty Ltd v National Competition Council (No 2) [2007] FCA 557 Cited cited 24×
  20. Arnhem Land Aboriginal Land Trust v Northern Territory of Australia [2007] FCAFC 31 Cited cited 11×
  21. Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Cited cited 134×
  22. Zentai v Honourable Brendan O’Connor [2009] FCA 1597 Cited cited 9×
  23. Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2009] FCA 284 Cited cited 6×
  24. Emirates v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2009] FCA 492 Applied or followed cited 6×
  25. Snedden v Republic of Croatia [2009] FCAFC 111 Cited cited 8×
  26. Zentai v Republic of Hungary [2009] FCAFC 139 Cited cited 5×
  27. Republic of Croatia v Snedden (2010) 84 ALJR 334 Cited cited 2×
  28. Roadshow Films Pty Ltd v iiNet Limited (No. 4) [2010] FCA 645 Cited cited 14×
  29. Zentai v Honourable Brendan O’Connor (No 3) [2010] FCA 691 Cited cited 13×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.