Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 3)

[2010] FCA 908

Federal Court of Australia · 17 August 2010 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2010: 1 citing judgment 2011: 1 citing judgment 2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 1 citing judgment 2010 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 4) [2010] FCA 909 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  2. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jones (No 5) [2011] FCA 49 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  3. Ronowska v Kus (No 2) [2012] NSWSC 817 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 19× · judgment
  4. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Artorios Ink Co Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1292 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (20)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. In R v Metal Trades & Employers Assn; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union [1951] ALR 93 Cited
  2. R v Metal Trades Employers' Association; Ex parte Amalgamated Engineering Union [1951] HCA 3 Cited cited 65×
  3. Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8 Applied or followed cited 2,918×
  4. R v Sharmpal Singh [1962] AC 188 Cited cited 3×
  5. Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan [1965] HCA 21 Cited cited 151×
  6. Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan [1966] ALR 387 Cited cited 3×
  7. Attorney-General (UK) v Times Newspapers Ltd [1973] 3 All ER 54 Cited cited 3×
  8. Attorney-General v Times Newspapers Ltd [1974] AC 273 Cited cited 61×
  9. Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union v Mudginberri Station Pty Ltd [1986] HCA 46 Cited cited 328×
  10. Witham v Holloway [1995] HCA 3 Cited cited 410×
  11. Michaels v The Queen [1995] HCA 8 Cited cited 17×
  12. RPS v The Queen [2000] HCA 3 Cited cited 245×
  13. Azzopardi v The Queen [2001] HCA 25 Cited cited 162×
  14. Dyers v The Queen [2002] HCA 45 Cited cited 94×
  15. Mead v Mead (2007) 81 ALJR 185 Cited
  16. Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing & Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2007] FCAFC 132 Cited cited 154×
  17. Jones v Toben [2009] FCA 354 Applied or followed cited 6×
  18. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones [2010] FCA 205 Cited cited 3×
  19. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Jones (No 2) [2010] FCA 371 Cited
  20. Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCA 481 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.