Pinpoint · Judgment search

Danaris Pty Ltd v J & M United Pty Ltd

[2011] FCA 220

Federal Court of Australia · 16 March 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (18)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Potts v Miller [1940] HCA 43 Cited cited 148×
  2. Viro v The Queen [1978] HCA 9 Cited cited 85×
  3. Gould v Vaggelas [1985] HCA 75 Applied or followed cited 434×
  4. Bateman v Slatyer (1987) 71 ALR 553 Cited cited 30×
  5. Elna Australia Pty Ltd v International Computers (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 2) [1987] FCA 230 Cited cited 77×
  6. Keen Mar Corporation Pty Ltd v Labrador Park Shopping Centre Pty Ltd [1989] FCA 46 Cited cited 3×
  7. Thors v Weekes [1989] FCA 795 Cited cited 88×
  8. Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Cited cited 388×
  9. Monroe Schneider & Assocs (Inc) v Raberem Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 1 Cited cited 29×
  10. March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd [1991] HCA 12 Cited cited 721×
  11. Smith New Court Securities Ltd v Citibank NA [1996] UKHL 3 Cited cited 50×
  12. Leda Holdings Pty Ltd v Oraka Pty Ltd & Anor [1997] FCA 1385 Cited
  13. Walcan Pty Ltd v Superior Coffee & Cakes Pty Ltd [2002] FCA 1211 Cited cited 2×
  14. Placer (Granny Smith) Pty Ltd v Thiess Contractors Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 10 Cited cited 158×
  15. Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Applicant S20/2002 [2003] HCA 30 Cited cited 648×
  16. HTW Valuers (Central Qld) Pty Ltd v Astonland Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 54 Cited cited 171×
  17. North East Equity Pty Ltd (ACN 009 248 819) v Proud Nominees Pty Ltd (ACN 074 270 938) [2010] FCAFC 60 Cited cited 27×
  18. J & M United Pty Ltd v Danaris Pty Ltd & Anor [2010] FMCA 713 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.