Pinpoint · Judgment search

NLR v R

[2011] NSWCCA 246

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 17 November 2011 · Official judgment

Cited by 11 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 4 Cited 7

2012: 1 citing judgment 2013: 3 citing judgments 2015: 2 citing judgments 2016: 2 citing judgments 2019: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2023: 1 citing judgment 2011 2015 2020 2025
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Ehrlich [2012] NSWCCA 38 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 32× · judgment
  2. Magnuson v R [2013] NSWCCA 50 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 61× · judgment
  3. Melbom v R [2013] NSWCCA 210 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 15× · judgment
  4. Montero v R [2013] NSWCCA 214 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 19× · judgment
  5. Mulder v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2015] NSWCA 92 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 23× · judgment
  6. Aktar v R [2015] NSWCCA 123 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  7. R v FRAZER KEVIN TANKS [2016] NSWSC 519 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  8. Jonson v R [2016] NSWCCA 286 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 59× · judgment
  9. R v JP [2019] NSWDC 700 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  10. R v Hovell (a pseudonym) [2021] NSWDC 326 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  11. R v Lincoln [2023] NSWDC 68 Applied or followed District Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (5)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. R v Ellis (1986) 6 NSWLR 603 Cited cited 239×
  2. Regina v Joseph Sukkar [2006] NSWCCA 92 Cited cited 114×
  3. OH Hyunwook v R [2010] NSWCCA 148 Cited cited 15×
  4. Brown v R, R v Brown [2010] NSWCCA 73 Cited cited 9×
  5. Ingham v R [2011] NSWCCA 88 Cited cited 30×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.