Pinpoint · Judgment search

Gommesen v R

[2012] NSWCCA 226 ; (2012) 62 MVR 196

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 1 November 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 22 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 1 Cited 21

2013: 5 citing judgments 2014: 3 citing judgments 2015: 2 citing judgments 2016: 3 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 1 citing judgment 2019: 2 citing judgments 2020: 2 citing judgments 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Warner (AKA Jeremy Pachenko) v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 10 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  2. Matthew Rose v R [2013] NSWCCA 71 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  3. Director of Public Prosecutions v Sadler [2013] NSWSC 718 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 11× · judgment
  4. O'Brien v R [2013] NSWCCA 197 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  5. Mark Jonathan Wright v Regina [2013] NSWDC 157 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Rajendran v R [2014] NSWCCA 113 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  7. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Mathews-Hunter [2014] NSWSC 843 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 8× · judgment
  8. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Lucas [2014] NSWSC 1441 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Monte v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) [2015] NSWSC 318 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Cowan v R [2015] NSWCCA 118 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 9× · judgment
  11. McCabe v R [2016] NSWCCA 7 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  12. R v Smith, Jarad [2016] NSWCCA 75 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 27× · judgment
  13. Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) v Robert Keith Tilley [2016] NSWSC 984 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  14. Robertson v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) & District Court NSW [2017] NSWCA 180 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  15. R v Shashati [2018] NSWCCA 167 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 16× · judgment
  16. Dixon v Regina [2019] NSWCCA 85 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  17. Karout v R [2019] NSWCCA 253 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 48× · judgment
  18. Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 67× · judgment
  19. BC v R [2020] NSWCCA 329 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 6× · judgment
  20. Zheng v R; Li v R; Pan v R [2021] NSWCCA 78 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 10× · judgment
  21. Kelley v R [2021] NSWCCA 173 Applied or followed NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  22. R v Foster [2022] NSWDC 467 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (7)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  2. REGINA v WHYTE [2002] NSWCCA 343 Cited cited 336×
  3. R v Wickham [2004] NSWCCA 193 Cited cited 168×
  4. R v Takai [2004] NSWCCA 392 Cited cited 9×
  5. REGINA v ERRINGTON [2005] NSWCCA 348 Cited cited 36×
  6. Regina v Darrell Terry McNaughton [2006] NSWCCA 242 Cited cited 487×
  7. Gonzalez v R [2006] NSWCCA 4 Cited cited 20×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.