Pinpoint · Judgment search

O'Sullivan v R; Flanders v R; Tohu v R & NRH v R

[2012] NSWCCA 45 ; (2012) 233 A Crim R 449

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 18 September 2012 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2016: 2 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2022: 1 citing judgment 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Lazarus v R [2016] NSWCCA 52 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 8× · judgment
  2. Castle v R [2016] NSWCCA 148 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Greenhalgh v R [2017] NSWCCA 94 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 51× · judgment
  4. Hayne v R [2022] NSWCCA 11 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 4× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (34)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Commissioner of Inland Revenue v Maple & Co (Paris) Ltd [1908] AC 22 Cited cited 14×
  2. Tooheys Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (NSW) [1961] HCA 35 Cited cited 69×
  3. Pemble v The Queen [1971] HCA 20 Cited cited 146×
  4. Ratten v The Queen [1974] HCA 35 Cited cited 163×
  5. Ausfield Pty Ltd v Leyland Motor Corporation of Australia Ltd (No 2) (1977) 14 ALR 457 Cited cited 7×
  6. Fountain v Alexander (1982) 40 ALR 441 Cited cited 6×
  7. Fountain v Alexander [1982] HCA 16 Cited cited 73×
  8. Butler v Johnston (1984) 4 FCR 83 Applied or followed cited 5×
  9. Perlman v Perlman [1984] HCA 4 Cited cited 21×
  10. Hatfield v Health Insurance Commission (1987) 15 FCR 487 Applied or followed cited 33×
  11. Zecevic v Director of Public Prosecutions (Vic) [1987] HCA 26 Cited cited 75×
  12. R v Zorad (1990) 19 NSWLR 91 Cited cited 90×
  13. Colakovski v Australian Telecommunications Corporation [1991] FCA 152 Cited cited 85×
  14. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade v Boswell (1992) 36 FCR 367 Applied or followed cited 9×
  15. R v Conlon (1993) 69 A Crim R 92 Cited cited 17×
  16. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  17. McHugh J; PMT Partners Pty Ltd (In liq) v Australian National Parks & Wildlife Service (1995) 69 ALJR 829 Cited cited 8×
  18. Re Dingjan; Ex parte Wagner [1995] HCA 16 Cited cited 110×
  19. PMT Partners Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Australian National Parks & Wildlife Service [1995] HCA 36 Cited cited 129×
  20. R v Condon [1995] NSWSC 119 Cited cited 17×
  21. Re Jarman; Ex parte Cook (1996) 70 ALJR 550 Cited cited 10×
  22. Joye v Beach Petroleum NL [1996] FCA 1552 Cited cited 45×
  23. R v Tangye (1997) 92 A Crim R 545 Cited cited 77×
  24. Melbourne v The Queen [1999] HCA 32 Cited cited 113×
  25. Papakosmas v The Queen [1999] HCA 37 Cited cited 415×
  26. OCEANIC LIFE LIMITED & ANOR v CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF STAMP DUTIES [1999] NSWCA 416 Cited cited 21×
  27. Bull v The Queen [2000] HCA 24 Cited cited 14×
  28. Doggett v The Queen [2001] HCA 46 Cited cited 69×
  29. R v Abou-Chabake [2004] NSWCCA 356 Cited cited 104×
  30. Ka Chung Fung v R [2007] NSWCCA 250 Cited cited 7×
  31. Taylor v R [2009] NSWCCA 180 Cited cited 13×
  32. W O v DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (NSW) [2009] NSWCCA 275 Cited cited 13×
  33. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  34. RH v R [2011] NSWCCA 98 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.