Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bailey v Director-General, Department of Natural Resources

[2013] NSWSC 515

Supreme Court of NSW · 17 May 2013 · Official judgment

Cited by 10 indexed judgments

All Cited 10

2014: 3 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 2 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2013 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Liao v State of New South Wales Zhang v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWCA 71 Cited NSW Court of Appeal · cited 16× · judgment
  2. Hoxton Park Residents Action Group Inc. v Liverpool City Council [2014] NSWSC 372 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  3. Bailey v Director General, Department of Natural Resources (formerly known as Department of Land and Water Conservation) [2014] NSWSC 1012 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 10× · judgment
  4. Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd v Whitebox Trading Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 324 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  5. SW by her tutor TW v MK [2018] NSWDC 504 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Chapman v Dickinson [2018] NSWDC 359 Cited District Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  7. Davaria Pty Limited v 7-Eleven Stores Pty Ltd (No 9) [2021] FCA 473 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  8. Searle v Commonwealth of Australia (No.5) [2022] NSWSC 119 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Wadsworth v Hamilton [2022] NSWSC 396 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  10. ACN 117 641 004 Pty Ltd (in liq) v S&P Global, Inc (No 4) [2025] FCA 72 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (3)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Allphones Retail Pty Limited (No 3) [2009] FCA 1075 Cited cited 17×
  2. Bailey v Department of Land and Water Conservation [2009] NSWCA 100 Cited cited 50×
  3. Gondarra v Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2012] FCA 185 Cited cited 12×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.