Pinpoint · Judgment search

Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2)

[2014] FCA 1062

Federal Court of Australia · 7 October 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 1 indexed judgment

All Cited 1

2014: 1 citing judgment 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services (No 2) [2014] FCA 1164 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (21)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Attorney-General v Wentworth (1988) 14 NSWLR 481 Cited cited 201×
  2. Rogers v The Queen [1994] HCA 42 Cited cited 398×
  3. Horvath v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1999] FCA 504 Cited cited 11×
  4. Ramsey v Skyring [1999] FCA 907 Cited cited 48×
  5. Granich & Associates v Yap [2004] FCA 1567 Cited cited 15×
  6. Jones Lang Lasalle (Qld) Pty Ltd v Dart [2005] FCA 1614 Cited cited 7×
  7. National Australia Bank Limited v Freeman (a Bankrupt) [2005] FCA 1895 Cited cited 6×
  8. Official Trustee in Bankruptcy v Gargan (No 2) [2009] FCA 398 Cited cited 44×
  9. Manolakis v Carter [2009] FCA 483 Cited cited 2×
  10. Seidler v University of New South Wales (No 3) [2011] FCA 1330 Cited cited 4×
  11. Soden v Kowalski [2011] FCA 318 Cited cited 18×
  12. [2012] AATA 107 Cited cited 4×
  13. [2012] AATA 699 Cited cited 4×
  14. [2013] AATA 473 Cited cited 4×
  15. [2013] AATA 945 Cited cited 5×
  16. Soames v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] FCA 260 Cited cited 6×
  17. Soames v Secretary, Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs [2013] FCA 938 Cited cited 3×
  18. [2014] AATA 258 Cited cited 3×
  19. Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] FCA 1054 Cited cited 2×
  20. Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] FCA 295 Cited cited 6×
  21. Soames v Secretary, Department of Social Services [2014] FCA 952 Cited cited 2×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.