Pinpoint · Judgment search

Panchal v R; R v Panchal

[2014] NSWCCA 275

NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · 26 November 2014 · Official judgment

Cited by 8 indexed judgments

All Cited 8

2015: 4 citing judgments 2017: 1 citing judgment 2019: 1 citing judgment 2020: 2 citing judgments 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. AF v R [2015] NSWCCA 35 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 13× · judgment
  2. Sabra v Regina [2015] NSWCCA 38 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 55× · judgment
  3. Aktar v R [2015] NSWCCA 123 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 11× · judgment
  4. Malicki v R; R v Malicki [2015] NSWCCA 162 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Regina (CTH) v Nahi Nasri Gazal [2017] NSWDC 65 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  6. Tindall v R [2019] NSWCCA 136 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 7× · judgment
  7. R v Agan [2020] NSWDC 85 Cited District Court of NSW · judgment
  8. Dogan v R [2020] NSWCCA 151 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 3× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. M v The Queen [1994] HCA 63 Cited cited 970×
  2. Pearce v The Queen [1998] HCA 57 Cited cited 1,558×
  3. MFA v The Queen [2002] HCA 53 Cited cited 513×
  4. R v Slack [2004] NSWCCA 128 Cited cited 30×
  5. Cahyadi v Regina [2007] NSWCCA 1 Cited cited 601×
  6. DOUSHA, Malcolm Ross v R [2008] NSWCCA 263 Cited cited 23×
  7. SKA v The Queen [2011] HCA 13 Cited cited 428×
  8. Green v The Queen [2011] HCA 49 Cited cited 741×
  9. SMITH James Duncan v R [2011] NSWCCA 163 Cited cited 10×
  10. JT v R [2012] NSWCCA 133 Cited cited 15×
  11. LG v R [2012] NSWCCA 249 Cited cited 15×
  12. Doe v Regina [2013] NSWCCA 248 Cited cited 39×
  13. W v R [2014] NSWCCA 110 Cited cited 28×
  14. Ingham v R [2014] NSWCCA 123 Cited cited 10×
  15. Simpson v R [2014] NSWCCA 23 Cited cited 42×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.