Pinpoint · Judgment search

Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd

[2015] FCA 1275 ; (2015) 238 FCR 209 ; (2015) 333 ALR 713

Federal Court of Australia · 18 November 2015 · Official judgment

Cited by 13 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 3 Cited 10

2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2022: 2 citing judgments 2023: 1 citing judgment 2024: 5 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2015 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACN 117 372 915 Pty Ltd (in liq) (formerly Advanced Medical Institute Pty Limited) [2016] FCA 1437 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  2. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Halkalia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2017] FCA 522 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 11× · judgment
  3. Mensink v Parbery [2018] FCAFC 101 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 14× · judgment
  4. Director of Consumer Affairs Victoria v Gibson (No 4) [2018] FCA 1868 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  5. Huang v Liao [2022] NSWSC 347 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 7× · judgment
  6. Huang & Ors v Liao (also known as Kurz) & Ors [2022] NSWSC 526 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 3× · judgment
  7. BCEG International (Australia) Pty Ltd v Xiao [2023] NSWSC 57 Applied or followed Supreme Court of NSW · cited 4× · judgment
  8. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] FCA 156 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  9. DC Rd DC Pty Ltd v Zhang (No 3) [2024] FCA 221 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  10. Guoao Holding Group Co Ltd v Xue (Contempt) [2024] FCA 278 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v Garrett (Contempt Hearing) [2024] FCA 482 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  12. Madsen v Darmali (No 3) [2024] NSWSC 582 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  13. Ultra Tune Australia Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2025] FCAFC 1 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (11)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Sun Newspapers Pty Ltd v Brisbane TV Ltd (1989) 92 ALR 535 Cited cited 18×
  2. Tchia v Rogerson (1992) 111 FLR 1 Cited cited 5×
  3. Madeira v Roggette Pty Ltd (No 2) [1992] 1 Qd R 394 Cited cited 5×
  4. National Australia Bank Ltd v Juric [2001] VSC 375 Cited cited 25×
  5. Advan Investments Pty Ltd v Dean Gleeson Motor Sales Pty Ltd [2003] VSC 201 Cited cited 43×
  6. Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2005] FCA 664 Cited cited 3×
  7. Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2006] FCAFC 116 Cited cited 48×
  8. Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2007] FCA 124 Cited cited 23×
  9. Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2008] FCA 3 Cited cited 4×
  10. Humane Society International Inc v Kyodo Senpaku Kaisha Ltd [2008] FCA 36 Cited
  11. Burwood Council v Ruan [2008] NSWLEC 167 Cited cited 36×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.