Pinpoint · Judgment search

Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2)

[2015] FCAFC 33 ; (2015) 228 FCR 334

Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · 19 February 2015 · Official judgment

Cited by 18 indexed judgments

All Cited 18

2015: 4 citing judgments 2016: 1 citing judgment 2017: 1 citing judgment 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 2 citing judgments 2022: 4 citing judgments 2023: 4 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2015 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Garrett v Cahill [2015] FCA 314 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 3) [2015] FCAFC 74 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  3. Guss v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2015] FCA 841 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  4. Liang v LV Property Investments Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1057 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  5. Commonwealth of Australia v CTC Resources NL; In the Matter of CTC Resources NL [2016] FCA 112 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  6. Hutchings v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2017] FCA 858 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Williams (formerly Turco) v Mortgage Ezy Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1567 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  8. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited v James (No 3) [2021] FCA 788 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  9. The Owners - Strata Plan No. 20347 v Saha [2021] FCA 961 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  10. James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2022] FCAFC 18 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  11. Toyota Finance Australia Limited v Youssef Berro [2022] FCA 497 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  12. Whiteman v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2022] FCA 975 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  13. Nida v BKA Practice Co Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 1257 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  14. Renet v The Owner - Strata Plan SP22143 [2023] FCA 631 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  15. Arwon Finance Pty Ltd v Wilson (No 2) [2023] FCA 657 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Owners of Majestic Rise and Majestic Crest Apartments Strata Plan 40793 v Spiro [2023] FCA 722 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  17. Aquamore Credit Equity Pty Ltd v Maroon [2023] FCA 1399 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  18. Queensland Building and Construction Commission v Mead [2024] FCA 1355 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (23)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Cain v Whyte (1933) 48 CLR 639 Cited cited 67×
  2. House v The King [1936] HCA 40 Cited cited 4,342×
  3. Rozenbes v Kronhill [1956] HCA 65 Cited cited 43×
  4. Field v Commercial Banking Co of Sydney Ltd [1978] 37 FLR 341 Cited
  5. Clyne v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [1985] FCA 4 Cited cited 19×
  6. Ahern v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (Qld) [1987] FCA 504 Cited cited 131×
  7. Re Ousley; Ex parte Commissioner of Taxation [1994] FCA 883 Cited cited 12×
  8. Wiltshire-Smith v Mellor Olsson (1995) 57 FCR 572 Cited cited 26×
  9. Cummings v Claremont Petroleum NL [1996] HCA 19 Cited cited 129×
  10. Bryant v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [1996] HCA 3 Cited cited 75×
  11. Ling, Noel v Enrobook Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 226 Cited cited 67×
  12. National Australia Bank Limited v Pollak [2001] FCA 1408 Cited cited 8×
  13. Commissioner of Taxation v Cumins [2008] FCA 353 Cited cited 18×
  14. Rotstein & Associates v Slaveski [2010] FCA 493 Cited cited 3×
  15. Russell v Polites Investments Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 11 Cited cited 12×
  16. Commonwealth v Davis Samuel Pty Ltd (No 7) [2013] ACTSC 146 Cited cited 19×
  17. Clapham v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2013] FCAFC 84 Cited cited 8×
  18. Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCCA 1167 Cited cited 2×
  19. Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCCA 1168 Cited cited 2×
  20. Endresz v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCCA 1169 Cited cited 2×
  21. Forge v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2013] FCCA 1170 Cited cited 2×
  22. Commonwealth v Davis Samuel Pty Ltd (No 8) [2014] ACTSC 312 Cited cited 5×
  23. Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Endresz [2014] FCA 786 Cited cited 3×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.