Pinpoint · Judgment search

MH v Australian Capital Territory

[2016] FCA 1355

Federal Court of Australia · 16 November 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 0 indexed judgments

No indexed judgment cites this case yet.

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Wade v Australian Railway Historical Society (South Australian Division) (t/as Steamranger) [2000] SASC 233 Cited cited 8×
  2. Branir Pty Ltd v Owston Nominees (No 2) Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1833 Cited cited 659×
  3. Farrington v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation [2002] FCA 1013 Cited cited 17×
  4. Fox v Percy [2003] HCA 22 Cited cited 1,476×
  5. Kowalski v Domestic Violence Crisis Service [2005] FCA 12 Cited cited 5×
  6. Tasmanian Sandstone Quarries Pty Ltd v Legalcom Pty Ltd [2010] SASFC 6 Cited cited 2×
  7. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Alfred [2011] FCAFC 13 Cited cited 11×
  8. Plaintiff S10/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] HCA 31 Cited cited 112×
  9. Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 32 Cited cited 235×
  10. Dahler v Australian Capital Territory [2014] FCA 946 Cited cited 4×
  11. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2014] HCA 41 Cited cited 86×
  12. MH v Australian Capital Territory & Ors [2016] FCCA 563 Cited
  13. Robinson Helicopter Company Inc v McDermott [2016] HCA 22 Cited cited 159×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.