Pinpoint · Judgment search

Bassili v The Star Pty Ltd

[2016] NSWCATAD 167

NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · 27 July 2016 · Official judgment

Cited by 22 indexed judgments

All Cited 22

2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 6 citing judgments 2022: 4 citing judgments 2023: 7 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2025: 1 citing judgment 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Frost v TAFE NSW [2020] NSWCATAD 219 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 2× · judgment
  2. ELV v Leaders In Real Estate Pty Limited [2021] NSWCATAD 135 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  3. Ayele v Costa Group t/as Costa Tomato Exchange Co [2021] NSWCATAD 198 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  4. Chariyan v Newcastle Quality Constructions Pty Ltd t/as McDonald Jones Homes [2021] NSWCATAD 197 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  5. Elali v Department of Customer Service [2021] NSWCATAD 302 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  6. Southey v Australian Press Council Inc [2021] NSWCATAD 329 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 7× · judgment
  7. Qiu v Hunter Express [2021] NSWCATAD 374 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  8. Mercieca v IHG Hotels Management Group (Australia) Pty Ltd & Salter Brothers (Coogee Beach) Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCATAD 63 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  9. Wolf Matthews v Secretary, Department of Education [2022] NSWCATAD 173 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Wadlow-Evans v Department of Communities and Justice [2022] NSWCATAD 301 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  11. Sedergreen v TAFE NSW [2022] NSWCATAD 319 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  12. Southey v The Australian Press Council [2023] NSWCATAD 29 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  13. Southey v The Australian Press Council [2023] NSWCATAD 33 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  14. Southey v The Australian Press Council [2023] NSWCATAD 117 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  15. Southey v The Australian Press Council [2023] NSWCATAD 115 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  16. Southey v The Australian Press Council [2023] NSWCATAD 121 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 1× · judgment
  17. Ferguson v Shoalhaven City Council [2023] NSWCATAD 276 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  18. Betty Dong v Strata Committee for Strata Plan 9859 [2023] NSWCATAD 281 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  19. Mallegowda v Secretary of the Department of Transport [2024] NSWCATAD 77 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · cited 2× · judgment
  20. Rowley v Charles Sturt University [2024] NSWCATAD 229 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  21. Alnajdi v The University of Sydney [2024] NSWCATAD 380 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment
  22. GXH v University of New England [2025] NSWCATAD 10 Cited NCAT Administrative and Equal Opportunity · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (5)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Seltsam Pty Limited v McGuiness; James Hardie & Coy Pty Limited v McGuiness [2000] NSWCA 29 Cited cited 320×
  2. Dutt -v- Central Coast Area Health Service [2002] NSWADT 133 Cited cited 212×
  3. Purvis v New South Wales (Department of Education and Training) [2003] HCA 62 Cited cited 351×
  4. Bassili v Star City Pty Ltd [2008] NSWADT 62 Cited cited 10×
  5. Ekermawi v Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales & Ors [2009] NSWSC 143 Applied or followed cited 201×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.