Pinpoint · Judgment search

Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 3)

[2017] FCA 1074

Federal Court of Australia · 8 September 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 4 indexed judgments

All Cited 4

2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 4) [2017] FCA 1599 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  2. Pleash (Liquidator) v Tucker [2018] FCAFC 144 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 4× · judgment
  3. Pleash (Liquidator) v Tucker (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 168 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · judgment
  4. Vines, in the matter of the Bankrupt Estate of Mitchell (No 2) [2024] FCA 1378 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (13)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Gartside v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1967] UKHL 6 Cited cited 59×
  2. Re Gulbenkian's Settlement Trusts [1970] AC 508 Cited cited 32×
  3. McPhail v Doulton [1970] UKHL 1 Cited cited 37×
  4. DKLR Holding Co (No 2) Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Stamp Duties [1980] 1 NSWLR 510 Cited cited 42×
  5. Re Kwiatek; Ex parte Big J Ltd v Pattison (1989) 21 FCR 374 Cited cited 35×
  6. Boys v Quigley [2002] WASCA 99 Cited cited 10×
  7. Wainter Pty Ltd, in the matter of New Tel Limited (in liq) ACN 009 068 955 [2005] FCAFC 114 Cited cited 79×
  8. Australian Securities and Investments Commission In the Matter of Richstar Enterprises Pty Ltd (ACN 099 071 968) v Carey (No 6) [2006] FCA 814 Applied or followed cited 40×
  9. Kennon v Spry [2008] HCA 56 Cited cited 51×
  10. Finch v Telstra Super Pty Ltd [2010] HCA 36 Cited cited 59×
  11. Fordyce v Ryan [2016] QSC 307 Cited cited 4×
  12. Pleash, in the matter of Equititrust Limited (In Liquidation) (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (No 2) [2017] FCA 758 Cited cited 7×
  13. Swishette Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2017] FCAFC 45 Cited cited 9×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.