Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union (The Australian Paper Case) (No 2)

[2017] FCA 367

Federal Court of Australia · 11 April 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 23 indexed judgments

All Distinguished 1 Applied or followed 3 Cited 19

2017: 1 citing judgment 2018: 5 citing judgments 2019: 4 citing judgments, 1 negative 2020: 3 citing judgments 2021: 5 citing judgments 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Huddy (No 2) [2017] FCA 1088 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 22× · judgment
  2. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Quest Apartments Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 163 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 17× · judgment
  3. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Nine Brisbane Sites Case) (No 3) [2018] FCA 564 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  4. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Upton (The Gorgon Project Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 897 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 6× · judgment
  5. Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2018] FCA 934 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  6. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The BKH Contractors Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1563 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  7. Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 48× · judgment
  8. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hassett [2019] FCA 855 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 8× · judgment
  9. Fair Work Ombudsman v National Union of Workers [2019] FCA 1826 Distinguished Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  10. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 201 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 17× · judgment
  11. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The BKH Contractors Appeal) [2020] FCAFC 9 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 6× · judgment
  12. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union [2020] FCA 549 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  13. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The College Crescent Case) [2020] FCA 757 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  14. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Ingham (The 180 Brisbane Construction Case) (No 2) [2021] FCA 263 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  15. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (No 3) (The Botany Cranes Case) [2021] FCA 363 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  16. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers' Union [2021] FCA 861 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  17. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Adelaide Airport Case) [2021] FCA 951 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 13× · judgment
  18. Australian Education Union v Yooralla Society of Victoria [2021] FCA 954 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  19. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Fair Work Ombudsman (The Botany Cranes Case) [2023] FCAFC 40 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 10× · judgment
  20. Coal Mining Industry (Long Service Leave Funding) Corporation v Hitachi Construction Machinery (Australia) Pty Ltd (Penalty) [2023] FCA 1187 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  21. Shergill v Singh (No 2) [2024] FCA 261 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  22. Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 8) [2024] FCA 483 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  23. Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (The Mordialloc Freeway Project Case) [2024] FCA 655 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (6)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 65 Cited cited 142×
  2. Williams v Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union [2010] FCA 754 Cited cited 18×
  3. QR Limited v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2010] FCAFC 150 Cited cited 37×
  4. Rocky Holdings Pty Limited v Fair Work Ombudsman [2014] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 36×
  5. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union (The Australian Paper Case) [2017] FCA 167 Cited cited 12×
  6. Australian Building and Construction Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Kane Constructions Case) [2017] FCA 168 Cited cited 8×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.