Pinpoint · Judgment search

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) (No 2)

[2022] FCA 19

Federal Court of Australia · 21 January 2022 · Official judgment

Cited by 3 indexed judgments

All Cited 3

2023: 3 citing judgments 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Fair Work Ombudsman v Albert (No 3) [2023] FCA 220 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Appeal) [2023] FCAFC 63 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 5× · judgment
  3. Fair Work Ombudsman v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) (No 3) [2023] FCA 1324 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (22)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd [1984] HCA 17 Cited cited 62×
  2. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  3. Australian Automotive Repairers' Association (Political Action Committee) Inc v NRMA Insurance Limited [2002] FCA 1568 Cited cited 19×
  4. Cruse v Multiplex Limited [2008] FCAFC 179 Cited cited 34×
  5. Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan [2008] FCAFC 70 Cited cited 129×
  6. Williams v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (No 2) [2009] FCA 548 Cited cited 27×
  7. Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39 Cited cited 255×
  8. Rocky Holdings Pty Limited v Fair Work Ombudsman [2014] FCAFC 62 Cited cited 36×
  9. Fair Work Ombudsman v NSH North Pty Ltd trading as New Shanghai Charlestown [2017] FCA 1301 Cited cited 22×
  10. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113 Cited cited 229×
  11. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Brooker Highway Case) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1214 Cited cited 5×
  12. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Non-Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] FCAFC 97 Cited cited 86×
  13. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3 Cited cited 152×
  14. Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56 Cited cited 48×
  15. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Nine Brisbane Sites Appeal) [2019] FCAFC 59 Cited cited 37×
  16. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Constitution Place Case) [2020] FCA 1070 Cited cited 9×
  17. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Menon [2020] FCA 1418 Cited cited 12×
  18. Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177 Cited cited 67×
  19. Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Bay Street Appeal) [2020] FCAFC 192 Cited cited 36×
  20. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (the WGC Cranes Case) [2021] FCA 622 Cited cited 6×
  21. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (Kiama Aged Care Centre Case) [2021] FCA 920 Cited cited 6×
  22. Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Adelaide Airport Case) [2021] FCA 951 Cited cited 13×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.