Pinpoint · Judgment search

R v Haydar (No.4)

[2017] NSWSC 615

Supreme Court of NSW · 19 May 2017 · Official judgment

Cited by 6 indexed judgments

All Cited 6

2019: 2 citing judgments 2022: 1 citing judgment 2023: 2 citing judgments 2024: 1 citing judgment 2017 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. R v Ahmed (No 3) [2019] NSWSC 625 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment
  2. Lechmana v R [2019] NSWCCA 112 Cited NSW Court of Criminal Appeal · cited 2× · judgment
  3. R v Gina Kennedy (a pseudonym) [2022] NSWSC 1499 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  4. R v Ahmed (No 2) [2023] NSWSC 105 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 2× · judgment
  5. R v Dempsey [2023] NSWSC 205 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · judgment
  6. R v Smith [2024] NSWSC 437 Cited Supreme Court of NSW · cited 1× · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (10)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Lowe v The Queen [1984] HCA 46 Cited cited 738×
  2. Veen v The Queen (No 2) [1988] HCA 14 Cited cited 1,716×
  3. Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70 Cited cited 841×
  4. Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 Cited cited 2,508×
  5. Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) v De La Rosa [2010] NSWCCA 194 Cited cited 1,099×
  6. Muldrock v The Queen [2011] HCA 39 Cited cited 1,670×
  7. Madden v R [2011] NSWCCA 254 Cited cited 20×
  8. Jonson v R [2016] NSWCCA 286 Cited cited 59×
  9. Barbieri v R [2016] NSWCCA 295 Cited cited 17×
  10. R v Haydar (No.3) [2017] NSWSC 159 Cited cited 6×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.