Pinpoint · Judgment search

Afu v Minister for Home Affairs

[2018] FCA 1311

Federal Court of Australia · 29 August 2018 · Official judgment

Cited by 20 indexed judgments

All Applied or followed 2 Cited 18

2018: 3 citing judgments 2019: 8 citing judgments 2020: 1 citing judgment 2021: 1 citing judgment 2022: 4 citing judgments 2024: 3 citing judgments 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026
citing judgments per year of which distinguished, doubted, not followed or overruled · line marks the decision

Sort: Oldest first Newest first Most cited

  1. Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1693 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  2. DNX16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1896 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  3. Ali v Minister for Home Affairs [2018] FCA 1895 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  4. FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 500 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 5× · judgment
  5. Donnelly v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 798 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  6. FCFY v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1222 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 4× · judgment
  7. Zyaran v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1205 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  8. Pohahau v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1243 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 2× · judgment
  9. Lee v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 1669 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 3× · judgment
  10. FYBR v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 185 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 64× · judgment
  11. Taualii v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 2013 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 7× · judgment
  12. Raumakita v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 224 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  13. CKL21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1019 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  14. CKL21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2022] FCAFC 70 Cited Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 26× · judgment
  15. Kwatra v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 680 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  16. Kwatra v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 194 Applied or followed Federal Court of Australia (Full Court) · cited 1× · judgment
  17. AWC21 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 1568 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  18. Nguyen v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 468 Cited Federal Court of Australia · cited 1× · judgment
  19. Lasalo v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 790 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment
  20. Varley v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2024] FCA 1087 Cited Federal Court of Australia · judgment

Tree of authority

Built on

The authorities this case relies on, earliest first, and the authorities those relied on. Open a branch to go further back.

Built upon

Later cases citing this one, in order of decision, and the cases citing them in turn. The most cited are shown at each level.

Authorities cited (15)

Earliest first, with how this judgment treated each.

  1. Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd [1986] HCA 40 Cited cited 2,191×
  2. Immigration and Ethnic Affairs, Minister for v Wu Shan Liang [1996] HCA 6 Cited cited 2,712×
  3. Price v Elder [2000] FCA 133 Cited cited 23×
  4. Htun v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1802 Distinguished cited 279×
  5. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30 Cited cited 1,750×
  6. In the matter of Reward Insurance Ltd [2004] FCA 151 Cited cited 19×
  7. Djalic v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 151 Cited cited 62×
  8. Lafu v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2009] FCAFC 140 Cited cited 78×
  9. MZABP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1391 Cited cited 230×
  10. Picard v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1430 Cited cited 50×
  11. Islam v Cash [2015] FCA 815 Cited cited 12×
  12. Goundar v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1203 Cited cited 81×
  13. YNQY v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1466 Cited cited 48×
  14. SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34 Cited cited 583×
  15. BZC17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 902 Cited cited 7×
How the citator works

Citations are read from the text of each indexed judgment. A report citation written alongside a neutral citation, such as [2008] HCA 9; (2008) 234 CLR 50, teaches the citator that both name the same case, so later citations by either are counted together.

Treatment is read from the words in the sentence that cites the case: overruled or disapproved; not followed or declined to follow; distinguished or distinguishable; doubted; applied, followed or adopted. Anything else is cited. It is a guide to which judgments to read, not a judicial history: a judgment that discusses a case at length without one of those words is shown as citing it, and one mentioning several cases in a sentence may attach the word to all of them.

Only judgments in this index are counted, mostly the High Court, the Federal Court and New South Wales courts and tribunals since 2006. Earlier cases appear as authorities but their own authorities are unknown, so a tree ends there. Check a treatment by reading the passage before relying on it.

Judgment text is from the Open Australian Legal Corpus (Isaacus, CC BY 4.0) and the courts’ own websites. Each judgment links to its official version: read it before relying on anything here.